My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. ERMUSR 05-12-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2009
>
05-12-2009
>
4.1. ERMUSR 05-12-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2009 10:43:16 AM
Creation date
5/12/2009 10:42:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
5/12/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
typically commercial accounts, but sometimes a specific or special need of a residential customer <br />may require that immediate response as well. Many of these after-hours trips are billable to the <br />customer. Currently there are approximately 700 security accounts. Of these there are 230 that <br />are outside of the City of Elk River. That is one-third of the security accounts that are not within <br />the City of Elk River. (Refer to the attached list of cities with ERMU security accounts that are <br />outside of the City of Elk River). Because of this, the probability of extending the response time <br />by traveling to the plant first and then deploying to the source of the call is even higher. That <br />directly impacts customer service because of the increase in response time for what is obviously <br />a critical after-hours calls. In order for the Utilities to maintain the level of customer service that <br />has been sold to our security customers, there needs to be a security technician on-call after- <br />hours. And in order for the Security Technician to be able to respond in the few critical after- <br />hours emergencies, the Security Technician needs to be equipped to do so. To provide that level <br />of customer service, the Security Technician needs to be equipped with atake-home vehicle. <br />Another aspect to eliminating on-call for some or all the current on-call employees is the impact <br />to employee morale. After a tumultuous year of change and uncertainty for the Utilities, the <br />employees had finally started to move on and unite in a common goal again. That is, until <br />recently when talk of reduced work hours and 0% cost of living increase brought employee <br />morale crashing to an all-time low. In the eyes of the employees, eliminating on-call and take- <br />home vehicles is just one more thing under attack, disrupting the focus of the company from <br />providing safe and reliable services to our ratepayers. Also, there is the benefit to the employee <br />that is attached to the on-call and take-home vehicles. Specifically to the Security Technician, <br />this employee was hired with 24/7/365 on-call and atake-home vehicle as part of the hiring <br />negotiations. These are typical within the security industry and are offered by ERMU's <br />competitors for similar jobs. This is true for management as well. Take-home vehicles are <br />typical for management at municipals, coops, and utility engineering consultant firms. <br />Eliminating this benefit creates a competitive disadvantage to attract and retain top talent. If <br />even one ERMU employee affected by the elimination of on-call or take-home vehicle were to <br />leave, the cost to the company to rehire, train, and assimilate into the Utilities would greatly <br />exceed any savings from eliminating this practices. As discussed at the April Commission <br />meeting, the cost, depending on the assumptions made, of the on-call take-home vehicles could <br />fall within the range of $6000 to $10000 per year. Either way, this is only 0.0002% of the <br />budget. But the cost of the negative impact to morale and employee retention could greatly <br />exceed that. A 0.0002% budget savings given back to the ratepayers as negative PCA credit <br />would not be noticeable. A reduction in customer service and a reduction in the Utilities ability <br />to provide safe reliable utilities could be noticed. It becomes a matter of public perception. <br />The bottom line is that the Utilities' employees want to do the best job they can and pride <br />themselves on their workmanship and sense of ownership in the system. The employees need to <br />be provided with the training and equipment required to supply the ratepayers with the highest <br />level of customer service providing safe and reliable utilities. Part of this is the on-call <br />emergency preparedness. And a critical part of emergency preparedness is the take-home <br />vehicles. This is important to the employees and to the customers. As previously stated, the <br />value to the Utilities in the 0.0002% of the budget allocated for on-call take-home vehicles is <br />found in the intangibles and not in the frequency of call-outs. This is Utilities' added ability to <br />better service their customers through emergency preparedness and quick response time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.