My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. ERMUSR 05-12-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2009
>
05-12-2009
>
4.1. ERMUSR 05-12-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2009 10:43:16 AM
Creation date
5/12/2009 10:42:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
5/12/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,~geesu~r <br />Z ~ '~ <br />a <br />yt `' <br />$EYENV~ <br />TAX EXEMPT AND <br />GOVERNMENT ENTITIES <br />DIVISION <br />Date: 4/30/09 <br />Ms. Theresa Slominski <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities <br />13069 Orono Parkway, P.O. Box 430 <br />Elk River, MN. 55330-0430 <br />Dear Ms. Slominski: <br />DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY <br />INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE <br />WASHINGTON. D.C. 20224 <br />This is in response to your email dated April 30, 2009, requesting clarification on the following vehicle fringe benefit <br />questions: <br />We would like clarification on these items in the form of a memo: <br />1) Utility vehicles are not exempt as public safety/emergency response vehicles (we had thought they were <br />previously) <br />2) Retroactive pay will not be necessary if we implement taxation moving forward, <br />3) The commuting rule rate of $1.50 per trip is applicable for proper taxation of the vehicles <br />4' The security van is exempt as a qualified vehicle <br />S, .'or the proper taxation of vehicles per employee, is the same rule to be applied to everyone or can it be case by <br />case? (If everyone doesn't qualify for the commuting rule, can we select FMV or mileage individually? How is <br />that determined which rule to apply?) <br />To recap, we have an electric on-call vehicle where the individual is paid to "engage to wait" and takes a phone <br />and vehicle for the week to respond to any calls. We have a rotation of employees who use the same on-call <br />vehicle (a pickup.) <br />We also have a water on-call individual (engaged to wait) in a rotation that takes a phone and their designated <br />work truck (pickup) that is assigned to them. This on-call vehicle is different week to week depending on the <br />employee. <br />The security vehicle is a van that has been tnodified with shelving instead of seats and is taken home every <br />evening. This is one employee that is responsible for all aspects of the security "business" and takes calls 24/7 <br />and responds appropriately. This employee is waiting to engage, ie is not paid an additional stipend to be on-call <br />24/7. <br />Currently there are four managers that take a vehicle home and are waiting to engage in that they would be required to <br />respond to any emergency situation. <br />'Thanks so much for your help. Please let us know if you have additional questions. <br />Theresa, Troy <br />Response <br />~1. Utility vehicles are not public safety/emergency response vehicles. To be a qualified nonpersonal use vehicle the <br />vehicle must be a clearly marked public safety officer vehicle that is required to be used for commuting by a public <br />safety officer as defined in section 402(1)(4)(C) who, is on call all the time, provided that any personal use (other <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.