My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. ERMUSR 05-12-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2009
>
05-12-2009
>
4.1. ERMUSR 05-12-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2009 10:43:16 AM
Creation date
5/12/2009 10:42:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
5/12/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
on-call responsibilities associated with the take-home vehicles qualify as "work-related activities <br />during hours when the employee is not working." The ERMU take-home vehicle on-call <br />practice and the responsibilities and requirements to be on-call are not written policies, but have <br />been long practiced by the Utilities over the previous decades. These on-call practices and <br />requirements need to be documented as policy. This brings forth the inevitable philosophical <br />discussion on who is required to be on-call and who needs atake-home vehicle. <br />Although being on-call and having atake-home vehicle do not technically go hand in hand, in all <br />practical purposes they do. For a company to require an employee to be on-call, the company <br />needs to provide the equipment for the employee to be able to respond. Specifically to this <br />discussion, the employer needs to provide a vehicle for the on-call employee to be able to <br />respond. This is an important part of providing the equipment and training needed for <br />emergency preparedness. Without that company vehicle, the employer could be compromising <br />customer service, response time, public safety, and the on-call employee's safety. Even within <br />ERMU there are cases where an employee only has one personal vehicle at home. If that vehicle <br />were not at home because it's being use by a spouse/dependent, the on-call response time would <br />greatly be affected. Many times the scene of an accident that prompts the summoning of an on- <br />call employee is already secured bylaw enforcement. When the scene is secured, an on-call <br />employee would not be able to gain access in a personal vehicle to assess and make <br />decisions/communications in order to facilitate safe/quick restoration of service. If the on-call <br />employee is the first to the scene but arrives in a personal vehicle, the employee would not be <br />able to safely secure the scene and protect the public because the personal vehicle lacks the <br />required equipment. The company vehicles are equipped with radios for communication, <br />personal protection equipment, flashing and/or visual safety indicators, equipment, and supplies. <br />It is neither practical nor good loss prevention practice to have employees equip their personal <br />vehicles with these items while being on-call. If an on-call employee needed to report to the <br />Utilities plant with a personal vehicle to get a company vehicle before responding to a scene, <br />valuable time could be lost. Not being able to respond directly to a scene compromises customer <br />service and safety. The bottom line is that for an employee to be required to be on-call, the <br />employer needs to provide the employee with the equipment to respond. This includes a vehicle. <br />If for the safety of the public the on-call employees need to be provided with atake-home <br />vehicle, this then brings up the question of who should be required to be on-call. There are a <br />number of different on-call situations within the Utilities. There are on-call electric and water <br />employees that are paid a stipend and have use of a vehicle for aweek of on-call (engaged to <br />wait). There are managers that are on call 24/7/365 who are not paid a stipend but have use of a <br />take-home vehicle (i.e. waiting to engage on-call). And, there is also a security technician on- <br />call 24/7/365 that is not paid a stipend but has the use of a take-home vehicle. Each of these on- <br />call situations is part of a company commitment to excellent customer service and public safety. <br />The general reasons for electric and water employees to be on-call are customer service and <br />safety. As the mission statement says, the Utilities provides safe and reliable services. Part of <br />providing safe reliable services is being able to respond to emergencies, outages, water main <br />breaks, and other after hour situations. And again, by being able to respond directly to the scene <br />in a take-home vehicle, the employee is able to use the radio to call for addition resources or <br />assistance including police, firefighters, emergency responders, or other utilities. These calls <br />would not be able to be made in the same expedited manner if the employee were not in a <br />company vehicle equipped with the items needed to safely do their job or if the employee had to <br />drive to the plant to pick up the company vehicle prior to responding. It is the Utilities' <br />responsibility that on-call employees are available after hours and are equipped, including the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.