My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. ERMUSR 05-12-2009
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2009
>
05-12-2009
>
4.1. ERMUSR 05-12-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2009 10:43:16 AM
Creation date
5/12/2009 10:42:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
5/12/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. ~, <br />Elk River <br />Municipal Utilities <br />13069 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430 <br />Elk River, MN 55330-0430 <br />April 30, 2009 <br />To: Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />John Dietz <br />Jerry Gumphrey <br />Daryl Thompson <br />From: Troy Adams <br />Subject: Company Vehicle Take-Home Practice <br />4~1 <br />Phone: 763.441.2020 <br />Fax: 763.441.8099 <br />At the April Commission meeting the agenda item pertaining to ERMU's company vehicle take- <br />home practice was tabled until May to allow for verification of information regarding tax <br />implications. There was a question as to whether or not the employees taking on-call vehicles <br />home would be subject to taxation. The Utilities' interpretation of the tax code had always been <br />that the take-home vehicles were tax exempted as "public safety" vehicles as specified in IRS <br />Publication 15-B. <br />The League of Minnesota Cities had looked into this topic on the Utilities' behalf and concluded <br />that there may be tax implications. They referred staff to IRS Representative Steve Bruzda for a <br />definitive ruling. The IRS representative confirmed that there are tax implications with the <br />exception of the Security on-call vehicle. (Refer to the attached letter and supporting <br />documentation from IRS Representative Steve Bruzda) Even though the Utilities' on-call <br />vehicles are used for emergency response, Utility on-call vehicles are not tax exempt as "public <br />safety" vehicles in the eyes of the IRS. This "public safety" exception is for firefighters, police, <br />emergency responders, and clergy. Based on this, going forward the take-home vehicle benefit <br />will be subject to taxation for the applicable ERMU employees. There are a number of methods <br />to calculate this tax including fair market value, mileage, and commuter rule (see attached <br />spreadsheet of applicable ERMU employees and the different taxations methods). Administered <br />within the limits of the tax code, this taxation will be implemented such that it has the least <br />impact to the employees. <br />Through the investigation into the tax implications of these vehicles, it has been determined that <br />ERMU's policy handbookneeds to be updated with clarifications pertaining to the take-home <br />vehicle on-call practice in order for the practice to meet Minnesota Statute 471.666. This statute <br />deals with publicly owned vehicles and prohibits their personal use. The Utilities' vehicles do <br />not fall under the "public safety" exception as previously interpreted. However, the actual <br />ERMU take-home vehicle on-call practice is still permitted under 471.66 Subd. 3 (1) because the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.