My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.3. ERMUSR 10-09-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2007
>
10-09-2007
>
6.3. ERMUSR 10-09-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2009 11:24:35 AM
Creation date
2/10/2009 11:22:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
10/9/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.0 Relicensing Process <br />Licensing of a hydroelectric generating plant is primarily regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory <br />Commission (FERC). As stated in FERC's Hydroelectric Project Licensing Handbook, "Under the <br />authority of the Federal Power Act, as amended by the Electric Consumers Protection Act, the Federal <br />Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has responsibility of issuing licenses for nonfederal <br />hydroelectric powerplants." The handbook goes on to say, "FERC regulations provide two procedural <br />alternatives for developing hydropower projects. First a developer may, as an initial step, seek a <br />preliminary permit. A permit allows the developer time to perform feasibility studies while maintaining <br />priority to file a later application for a license. Alternatively, since a preliminary permit is not a <br />prerequisite, a developer may file directly for a license or an exemption without requesting a preliminary <br />permit." <br />Review of the FERC handbook indicates that based on the project site it would be appropriate to file for <br />an exemption from a license at the site. Conservations with Dana Gauthier, Minnesota Department of <br />Natural Resources Dam Safety, and Ed Abrams, FERC Licensing Washington DC, indicated a FERC <br />license or possibly an exemption are required to develop the site. FERC staff also indicated that, in order <br />to file and secure a license, the developer (Elk River Municipal Utilities) needs to have, among other <br />items, rights to the water, must own the lands on which the project is located, and have a means for power <br />transmission. Ownership of the lands must be clarified to determine if this is meant to be the land that the <br />dam, generating, and transmission facilities are located or if this means the entire land around the <br />impoundment. The issue of land ownership can be determined early in the licensing process. Copies of <br />the current section titled, Obtaining an Exemption from Licensing, by FERC is included as Appendix 2-1. <br />Ed Abrams indicated that among a large list of issues the licensing process is very dependent on site- <br />specific conditions and the other regulatory concerns such as the presence of rare and endangered species, <br />fish and other aquatic species migration, and water and water quality. He indicated that the licensing and <br />exemption process can take from 18 months to well over 24 months to complete. The cost of relicensing <br />is dependent upon the number of studies that need to be completed as part of the process. While the <br />FERC is responsible for licensing hydroelectric projects, they will seek input from state and federal <br />agencies and other stakeholders. Because the position of the agencies regarding development of <br />hydroelectric generation is a critical part of the licensing process and ultimately the cost to obtain a <br />license, Elk River Municipal Utilities should consider developing a letter that could be sent to all of the <br />likely state and federal agencies that would be a stakeholder in the process indicating that the Utility is <br />considering redevelopment of hydroelectric generation at the Lake Orono Dam site and is seeking <br />feedback regarding possible issues related to the redevelopment. Alternatively, an invitation to a meeting <br />could also be included to discuss the possible redevelopment. Responses to the letter or meeting would <br />provide an initial assessment of the difficulty or ease of the licensing process. <br />P:\Mpls\23 MN171\2371089 Elk River Municipal-Orono Dam\WorkFiles\Report\Lake Orono Dam Assessment Report.doc 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.