My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 08-20-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
08/20/2007
>
6.2. SR 08-20-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:05 AM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:09:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/20/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Downtown Redevelopment Plan Task Force Minutes <br />March 5, 2007 <br />Page 4 <br />Member Lindberg asked how long the construction of an elevated Hwy would last. Mr. <br />Maurer stated that he couldn't say fox sure' since the area is so confined but that it would <br />more than likely last for an entire construction season. <br />Member Holme asked if there is enough bight of Way to elevate or lower the highway. Mr. <br />Maurer stated "yes" especially if MnDOT ~Ieliminates several access points to allow <br />for six lanes of traffic. I <br />Ms. Kvilvang asked what would happen tc~ The Bank of Elk River's parking lot located on <br />the north side of Hwy 10 if the highway was elevated or lowered. Mr. Maurer said that he <br />believes most of the parking lot currently ~s built in MnDOT's Right of Way so MnDOT <br />would probably remove the parking lot. <br />Member Wilson inquired whether closing Ithe Jackson Avenue/Hwy 10 intersection would <br />make sense. Mr. Maurer explained that one of the reasons Main Street was chosen as an <br />example is because of the super-elevated r~ilxoad tracks at that intersection. Mr. Leeseberg <br />added that the Fire Department may haveconcerns with closing the Jackson intersection <br />because of the nearby fire station. <br />Mr. Maurer mentioned that another optio~i would be to eliminate both Main Street and <br />Jackson Avenue intersections and create a new one altogether. <br />Member Lindberg stated that he prefers a',Hwy 10 improvement option that would cause the <br />least amount of buildings to be removed. ', <br />Member Tveite reminded the group that tie Main Street intersection is confined by the <br />Parrish Avenue bridge, the railroad tracks',and Hwy 10 and that it is a tough intersection no <br />matter what MnDOT decides to do with it in the future. <br />Member Rymanowski mentioned the cost/benefit to eliminating one intersection versus <br />elevating or lowering the highway howevelr eliminating one intersection would cause a major <br />land acquisition impact. Mr. Maurer conc rred. <br />Member Lieser asked if the Main Street/ wy 10 intersection was closed, would Proctor <br />remain open. Mr. Maurer stated that Jackson, Proctor, Upland and Joplin would remain <br />open but MnDOT may eliminate the Waco intersection. <br />Small Groups <br />The Task Force broke into three small groups and discussed the following three polity <br />questions: <br />1) Is it important that downtown be "seen" and/or accessed from Hwy 10? <br />o Which option for Hwy 1p is least detrimental to downtown? <br />^ Elevated <br />^ Lowered <br />^ At grade <br />The Task Force consensus was that leaving Hwy 10 at grade would be the least detrimental <br />to downtown due to the importance of maintaining a sense of place and image that one is <br />entering the downtown. The Task Force lalso agreed that it is important for downtown to be <br />accessed from Hwy 10, although recognised that the downtown does not draw or depend on <br />customer traffic from Hwy 10. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.