My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 08-20-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
08/20/2007
>
6.2. SR 08-20-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:05 AM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:09:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/20/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Downtown Redevelopment Plan Task Force Minutes <br />March 5, 2007 <br />Page 5 <br />2) Is the land area north of Hwy 10 an ~'xtension of the core downtown and should the <br />Plan recognize this? <br />The Task Force consensus was that the north of Hwy 10 downtown is not an extension of <br />the core downtown but that the land uses Ion the north side should compliment the core <br />downtown. <br />3) Should the Plan reflect the downtown area extending further west along Main Street? <br />The Task Force consensus was that the natural progression of downtown redevelopment <br />will most likely extend west along Main Stjreet as driven by the market. <br />More details of the small group discussion are attached. <br />6. Photo "Homework" Summary <br />Assistant Director of Economic Development Heidi Steinmetz stated that the photo <br />summary provided tonight is meant to generate ideas in preparation for next month's first <br />visioning meeting but that the photos will be used as references to assist the Task Force in <br />transferring ideas to paper. The summary included groupings of similar photos taken by <br />members during the month of January. (Many members explained to the group why each <br />photo was taken. <br />Member Wilson expressed concern that the summary only included Elk River photos and <br />that he understood the assignment was rneant to obtain photos outside of Elk River. Ms. <br />Steinmetz stated that he understood the assignment correctly and that the rest of the photos <br />would definitely be used during the visioning process. <br />7. Next Steps <br />Ms. Kvilvang stated that the Task Force v~ould be breaking into two visioning groups at next <br />month's meeting on April 9th, which will be facilitated by Michael Schroeder of LHB <br />Architects and Engineers and Planner Chris Leeseberg. Ms. Mehelich reminded the group <br />that there is an EDA meeting prior to the Task Force meeting so the Task Force meeting <br />would begin at 6:30pm. <br />8. Final Comments <br />Ms. Kvilvang asked each Task Force member to talk about his/her reactions to tonight's <br />presentation. The comments are listed below: <br />• Dave Rymanowksi: It doesn't "pay" to spend $21 million on Hwy 10 if the Level of <br />Service will remain an "F". <br />• John Anderson: concurred with ~vlr. Rymanowski <br />• Stewart Wilson: <br />• Jean Lieser: Any improvements do Hwy 10 are "out there a ways." <br />• Molly Nadeau: MnDOT doesn't~seem to be under any pressure to improve Hwy <br />10, <br />• Keith Holme: The north and south sides of Hwy 10 should be developed <br />separately. We need to wait to redevelop further west along Main Street until there <br />is a market for it. We need to make sure we maintain a nice buffer between the <br />commercial and the residential located along Main Street. <br />• Larry Toth: Redevelopment along Main Street should not extend father than <br />Lowell Avenue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.