Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />pqe3 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />April 22, 1986 <br /> <br />Tralle indicated he felt <br />will have to deal with it. <br />City is really growing and <br />arrives. <br /> <br />traffic was one of the major issues here and we <br />Chairman Tralle further indicated he felt the <br />we will deal with the traffic issue as,it <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission and that of the several people <br />who were present who had spoken against the campground it was because of <br />the traffic it would generate. <br /> <br />Mr. Raudio discussed fencing in length with the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />was concerned about the fencing of the area and wanted to have <br />link fences put up between his property and the campground with <br />in between each fence so they could not throw trash on his <br />and for safety reasons. <br /> <br />Mr. Miske <br />two chain <br />25 feet <br />property <br /> <br />Chairman Tralle felt Mr. Miske was being unreasonable to ask for a double <br />chain link fence. <br /> <br />Mr. Miske indicated that whoever owns the fence <br />responsibility for it. <br /> <br />should <br /> <br />full <br /> <br />take <br /> <br />Mrs. Turner of 18776 Cleveland Street indicated a barb wire fence would be <br />O.K. with her with three or four strands of wire. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that there should be one <br />uniform fence for the area. <br /> <br />. <br />Mr. Raudio indicated he would go along with fencing and screening that is <br />reasonable that the council recommends. <br /> <br />Chairman Tralle closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Discussion was held regarding the <br />which would be County Road 12. <br />distance within the Campground roadway <br /> <br />principal entrance to the campground <br />Also that there be adequate stacking <br />system. <br /> <br />DiScussion was held regarding the proposed grocery store and daycare <br />center. The City Attorney indicated that the daycare and grocery store <br />are not allowable as ordinance reads. He further indicated that these <br />were not classified as essential services and the ordinance would have to <br />be changed to allow the grocery store and daycare center as an accessory <br />use to a campground. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the proposed general <br />store and daycare center shall not be allowed unless the ordinance is <br />changed to allow these as an accessory use to a campground. <br />