My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-25-1989 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1980 - 1989
>
1989
>
07-25-1989 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:32 AM
Creation date
9/19/2005 3:05:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
7/25/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />7/25/89 <br /> <br />Commissioner Fuchs explained that he was concerned about the traffic <br />as he did not know what was going into the two additional stalls. <br />could be very heavy compared to a furniture store. <br /> <br />flow <br />This <br /> <br />Steve Bjork explained that parking was based on retail space not a <br />furniture store. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schroeder felt that the location and space of this site was <br />much better than a lot of other Quick Lubes he had patronized. <br />Commissioner Schroeder did not feel there was a problem with the lot size <br />and traffic flow. Commissioner Schroeder noted that the Quick Lubes in <br />the Twin Cities have a much smaller piece of property than what is <br />located here. He felt the "Car Wash" and "Quick Lube" go together. <br /> <br />Mr. Artac indicated that traffic should not be a problem. Mr. Artac <br />explained that the Car Wash has eight times as many cars per day as the <br />"Quick Lube" He stated that we are selling time and convenience. This <br />type of service will be completed in about 10 minutes. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fuchs felt that this business would better fit another piece <br />of property and would like to see the structure moved further back as <br />this business will be setting out front in the shopping center. Steve <br />Bjork indicated that there are constraints from building farther back <br />because of the storm water sewer there. If this wasn't there they would <br />be able to move the building back off Freeport. Mr Bjork further <br />explained that you can control the building with setbacks and also can <br />place limitation on the building. <br /> <br />Commissioner Eberley indicated she would like to see more green space. <br />Steve Bjork noted that there is room for additional landscaping if the <br />Commission requires that. <br /> <br />Steve Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator gave a brief summary at <br />this time to clarify the issues. He further indicated that the <br />underlying land use is Highway Commercial. Typically we require one <br />acre for that zoning designation per structure. The petitioner is <br />short on acreage for two structures. Staff felt that the parking and <br />drive would work. What they are short of is green space and setback. <br /> <br />Steve Bjork <br />required for <br />the 40 ft. <br /> <br />explained that they could conceivably meet all the setbacks <br />the C-3 zone if they were to move the building north to meet <br />rear yard setback. Mr. Bjork further explained that if the <br />were designed under the C-3 standards, they could meet the <br />However, it is a PUD, deviating from those requirements may <br />a better plan. <br /> <br />structures <br />standards. <br />give them <br /> <br />Chairman Kimball was in agreement with Commissioner Fuchs and Eberley <br />that more green space was needed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fuchs suggested flip flopping the building as to allow for <br />more green space. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.