My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.1 SR 10-18-2021
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2021
>
10-18-2021
>
8.1 SR 10-18-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2022 1:26:58 PM
Creation date
10/15/2021 10:05:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
10/18/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stormwater <br />The City of Elk River is responsible for its stormwater <br />management system. Through the city's Stormwater <br />Management Plan, Elk River maintains a system of catch <br />basins, pipes, ditches, and detention ponds. There is no <br />Watershed District or Water Management Organization <br />with jurisdiction in the city. This means the city is regu- <br />lated as a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) <br />community, responsible for compliance with National <br />Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit- <br />ting requirements, including its Stormwater Ordinance <br />and the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). <br />Encourage the Integration of Ponds <br />in Developments as a means for <br />Stormwater Management <br />With nearly 400 stormwater ponds in the city's system, <br />ponds are a major component of water management in Elk <br />River. Stormwater ponds enable treatment of drainage in <br />ways, such as the settling of sediment particles, which can <br />accumulate over time and require maintenance to ensure <br />performance of the system. The city should continue to <br />monitor its stormwater ponds and incorporate pond issue <br />resolution into other development projects like it did with <br />the 269 Redefine project. <br />Implement Green Infrastructure <br />As the State of Minnesota has experienced more intense <br />rain events, green infrastructure offers cost-effective, <br />resilient approaches to management of wet weather <br />impacts. The definition of "green infrastructure" goes back <br />to the Clean Water Act, in which it is identified as a range <br />of measures such as plant or soil systems, permeable <br />surfaces, or landscaping to store or infiltrate stormwater <br />and reduce flows to sewer systems or to surface waters. <br />Single purpose "gray stormwater" infrastructure (conven- <br />tional piped drainage) works to move stormwater away <br />from the built environment. Conversely, green infrastruc- <br />ture reduces and treats stormwater at its source, while <br />often providing other environmental, social, or economic <br />benefits. Most of Elk River has soils that are conducive to <br />green infrastructure principles; that is, the soils tend to <br />drain well. In some locations near water supply wells, the <br />application of green infrastructure infiltration measures <br />needs to be done with care to ensure contaminants are not <br />introduced to the water supply. <br />The schematic below provides an overview of the spectrum <br />of stormwater control practices from green to gray infra- <br />structure. As Elk River grows and considers new opportu- <br />nities for optimizing its investments in the built environ- <br />ment, green infrastructure practices should be evaluated. <br />While helping to mimic or restore natural hydrology to <br />areas, it may also create secondary ecosystem benefits <br />with natural habitat, water purification, erosion protection, <br />and a more sustainable urban environment. <br />Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) <br />Natural Areas <br />Stormwater Ponds <br />Rain <br />Filtration & <br />& Wetlands <br />Garden <br />Infiltration Basin <br />Intact forests, <br />SCMs capable of <br />vegetated SCMs in <br />Surface SCMs like <br />Wetlands, and other <br />providing habitat and <br />urban or suburban <br />sand fitters within <br />undeveloped areas <br />resembling natural <br />settings <br />minimal vegetation <br />areas <br />Green Infrastructure <br />Temporary <br />Underground <br />Conventional <br />Flood Storage <br />Storage <br />Drainage <br />Surface SCMs like <br />Underground SCMs, <br />Urban drainage <br />dry ponds with <br />potentially including <br />strategies, primarily <br />minimal vegetation <br />storage, filtration, or <br />concrete-basedwith <br />or infiltration <br />infiltration <br />limited infiltration or <br />storage <br />Gray Infrastructure <br />Source, Taguchi W, Weiss PT, GullrverJ$ Klein MR, Hozalski RM BakerLA, nclaiJC, KeelerBL, NieberJL.Itls NotEasyBeing Green Remgnizing Unintended <br />Consequences ofGmen Stororwaterinfiustructure Water. 202012(2).522, https.Ildoi.org4o.3390IM2020522 <br />100 Infrastructure • Elk River Comprehensive Plan <br />I97CL\aIII M91A0:051IMAVE9701wo <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.