Laserfiche WebLink
The appraiser completed a full interior and exterior inspection of the subject property and improvements. All other <br />subject property information was gathered from available county records, GIS and other data sources, as necessary. <br />A MnDOT survey crew located and marked the existing right of way, proposed temporary easement and proposed <br />driveway location to aid the appraiser and property owner in identifying the proposed acquisition area. Note, <br />interior photos of the subject home were taken but are retained in the appraiser's work file. <br />Highest and Best Use of the Subiect: <br />A logical and thorough analysis of the subject property's highest and best use is vital to the value conclusion. <br />During this analysis process, certain logical deductions were made. This method is further discussed under the <br />Highest and Best Use section of this report. <br />Valuation Process: <br />The three valuation approaches — Cost Approach, Sales Comparison Approach, and Income Approach — were each <br />considered for use. The subject property is improved with a single family rental residence; however, the proposed <br />acquisition will not directly impact the subject improvements; therefore only the subject land will be valued in the <br />appraisal. With no building considered in the valuation, the Cost Approach to value is not applicable. As -if vacant <br />residential land similar to the subject is not typically leased in this market area; therefore, the Income Approach to <br />value is not applicable in the development of the site value. Only the Sales Comparison Approach was used to <br />determine market value of the subject site in the before and after conditions. The Sales Comparison Approach is <br />typically the most reliable indication of value for partial acquisitions of land only. <br />Income Approach techniques were utilized in the development of severance damage estimates due to the current <br />income producing rental use of the subject property. Cost Approach techniques were utilized in the estimation of <br />site improvement values. <br />Data Research: <br />Sales data for the Sales Comparison Approach was collected by research of information from the multiple listing <br />service (MLS), information available at the Sherburne County Assessor's departments and the Minnesota Revenue <br />eCRV website. Discussion with the Assessor's personnel corroborated that the information obtained there had been <br />verified, as much as possible. These sources are considered reliable and their data accurate. Comparable sales were <br />viewed by the appraiser. The properties determined to be most comparable to the subject property were selected <br />and included in the report. <br />MARKETABILITY AND ESTIMATED MARKETING/EXPOSURE TIME <br />Based on interviews with local market participants and available sales data; improved sales of properties similar to <br />the subject property are estimated to require a marketing time of approximately 3 months which includes <br />consideration for the current winter marketing season. The estimate of exposure time is considered to be the same <br />or less than the marketing time, estimated at 3 months or less. There is currently only a 2.7 month supply of single <br />family housing in the Elk River market, which directly influences the short marketing times. <br />Vacant residential land within the subject's market of Elk River is estimated to require a marketing and exposure <br />time of approximately 3 months; say 2 to 4 months. The marketing and exposure time estimates are based on a <br />sale study utilizing the Northstar MLS that was performed within the subject's Elk River market area for similar <br />single family residential vacant land properties to the subject. A total of 12 sales were recorded over the past three <br />years with a range in marketing time from 7 days on market (DOM) to 1,316 DOM; however, the high end of the <br />range was an outlier. The adjusted high end of the range is 228 DOM. The adjusted mean marketing time was 87 <br />days and the median was 82 days, indicating a typical marketing time of approximately 3 months, say 2 to 4 <br />months. There appears to be a stable balance of available land on the market. <br />S.P. 7102-135RW C.S. 7102 (10=3) 902 Parcel 7102-902-229C Page 20 <br />