My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MISC APPEAL EMAILS
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2020
>
04-27-2020 BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION
>
MISC APPEAL EMAILS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2021 10:27:36 AM
Creation date
4/29/2020 8:37:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/27/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SCOPE OF WORK <br />General Statements: USPAP requires a thorough discussion and disclosure of the scope of work. <br />Scope of work is defined as being the extent to which the property is identified and inspected, the extent to which <br />tangible property is inspected, the type and extent of data researched, and the types and extent of analysis applied <br />to arrive at opinions or conclusions. The scope of work is acceptable when it is consistent with the expectations of <br />the party/parties who are regularly intended users of similar assignments and when it meets or exceeds what an <br />appraiser's peers' actions would be in performing the same or a similar assignment. A properly conducted <br />appraisal and its report must be logical, unbiased, credible, and defendable. <br />The scope of work of this appraisal involved the following steps: <br />1 <br />Identify the problem: <br />What is the total just compensation for the acquisition? <br />a) What is the market value of the acquisition as of the effective date? <br />b) Does the acquisition diminish the market value of the remainder? If <br />es, what is the monetary amount of damages? <br />2 <br />Identify the subject and its <br />MnDOT supplied many items to identify the subject, including mapping, <br />detailed information: <br />certificate of title, afield title report, and legal description of subject. <br />The property was inspected and photographed. Tax and Assessors' <br />records were collected. The appraiser interviewed landownerlre . <br />3 <br />Determine the Highest and <br />A review of the neighborhood and local market was made. All property <br />Best Use of the subject <br />characteristics and aspects of Highest and Best Use were considered, <br />analyzed, and reported. <br />4 <br />Define the proper appraisal <br />All three Approaches to value (Cost, Income, and Sales Comparison) <br />methods to be used <br />were considered for use. The Sales Comparison Approach was <br />considered to be the only appropriate approach to properly value the <br />partial acquisition. The Cost and Income Approaches were utilized in the <br />estimation o site improvement values and severance damages. <br />5 <br />Gather the data necessary to <br />Researched and verified local comparable sales information from <br />solve the problem. <br />trustworthy sources. <br />6 <br />Apply the information into the <br />Analyzed the data, summarized, and reconciled <br />methods and make conclusion <br />7 <br />Report the information and the <br />Produced the written report <br />conclusion with clarity <br />SPECIFIC SCOPE OF WORK STATEMENTS <br />Identification of Subject: <br />The client supplied pertinent information regarding the project, the subject property, and the partial acquisition <br />proposed. Pertinent information included numerous items including: a certificate of title, a field title interview <br />report, county property tax information, a parcel sketch, area computations, and maps of the subject and the <br />project. Other maps and information were obtained from the City of Elk River, Sherburne County departments and <br />website, and independent online sources. <br />Inspection of the Subject: <br />The appraiser initially viewed the subject property and acquisition on January 16th, 2020. The appraiser <br />interviewed the owner -representative, Mr. Ronald Touchette on November 27th, 2019, who was afforded the <br />opportunity to accompany the appraiser on an inspection of the subject property. The owner/representative <br />accepted the invitation to attend the inspection and was present at the time of inspection. The current tenant was <br />also present at the time of inspection. <br />S.P. 7102-135RW C.S. 7102 (10=3) 902 Parcel 7102-902-229C Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.