My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.4. SR 06-03-2019
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2019
>
06-03-2019
>
10.4. SR 06-03-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2019 8:11:54 AM
Creation date
5/30/2019 4:12:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/3/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the perpetually <br />expanDing terM <br />Up until 1956, Toronto held mu- <br />nicipal elections each year. A series <br />of referendums asked voters if <br />they supported a longer term for <br />Council and almost every time, the <br />answer was ‘No’. <br />Eventually, the term changed <br />to two years, then three. The most <br />recent change, however, happened <br />without any referendum at all. At <br />the request of Councillors and <br />Mayors from across the Ontario, <br />the provincial government changed <br />the term to four years, with no <br />consultation or debate. In fact, the <br />change was buried as a minor note <br />in a budget bill. It seems wrong that <br />politicians are able to change their <br />office terms without consulting their <br />true employers: us. <br />At the local level in particular, <br />four years is very long. Unlike mi- <br />nority governments at the provincial <br />and federal levels, a City Council <br />government can never fall on a con- <br />fidence vote – even if their public <br />support has plummeted. Despite <br />the often-heard argument that three <br />years “isn’t enough time to plan <br />anything”, we know that City Coun- <br />cillors built the Yonge Street subway, <br />the Bloor Street Viaduct, our sewage <br />system, and the R.C. Harris water <br />plant – all with single year terms. <br />Longer terms mean one thing: <br />less accountability. And the trend <br />we’ve seen in the last five decades is <br />unsettling: <br />Fun FacT! <br />in 2006, councillor Michael Walker <br />put forward a motion at city council <br />against the introduction of the <br />four year term, and requested <br />a public referendum instead. <br />the motion was seconded by ten <br />councillors, including then-councillor <br />rob Ford and six members of his current inner circle: <br />David shiner, cesar palacio, Michael thompson, karen <br />stintz, Mike Del grande and Doug holyday. <br />“Should we extend the term of City Council from one year, <br />to two?” this referendum was held eight times in the city <br />of toronto: yEs no <br />Jan 1, 1912 6,764 23,854 <br />Jan 1 1940 29,978 74,053 <br />Jan 1, 1941 28,189 58,527 <br />Jan 1, 1947 48,547 51,403 <br />Jan 1, 1949 50,440 73,250 <br />Dec 4, 1950 63,863 104,109 <br />Dec 1, 1952 50,278 69,320 <br />Dec 5, 1955 47,958 33,742 <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />THEN WHAT?TODAY1834 <br />? <br />Municipal elections <br />per DecaDe
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.