My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda 07-06-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1995
>
07-06-1995
>
Agenda 07-06-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2018 2:30:36 PM
Creation date
4/30/2018 2:30:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br /> GMPTF Minutes <br /> February 8, 1988 <br /> • <br /> 1. The area on the west side of the City, south of the railroad tracks <br /> and north of the Elk River should remain in the Urban Service <br /> District area. This area is mostly developed at this time but future <br /> developments should be aware of fact that municipal sewer and water <br /> may be coming to this vacinity at some time the future. Any future <br /> plats or development should be laid out in a manner that allows for <br /> future subdivision of properties when municipal utilities are <br /> required to be installed. Proposed plats in this area would be <br /> required to prepare for overlays for future division of lots. <br /> 2. The Ridgewood subdivisions between Proctor Avenue and Highway 169 <br /> should remain within the Urban Service District. This area is fully <br /> developed but municipal sewer and water may be required at some time <br /> in the future due to ground water pollution. <br /> 3. That the area in the northeast part of the Urban Service District <br /> around Ulysses Street and 195th Avenue should be transferred to the <br /> two and one half acre development district. The rationale for this <br /> transfer was that the lots are currently developed in a larger sized <br /> manner and that it is unlikely that sewer and water would be required <br /> in this area unless a petition from residents in this area was <br /> received by the City. <br /> 4. That part of the area in the southeast part of the Urban Service <br /> • District from a line parallel with 181st Street and south be excluded <br /> from the District. Additionally, the area north of 181st Street <br /> would remain within the Urban Service District as utilities are <br /> readily available in this vacinity and this area would most likely <br /> develop in a residential manner. The area south of 181st Street most <br /> likely would develop in an Industrial manner. Additionally, if sewer <br /> was required or requested south of 181st Street, such sewer could be <br /> available within a limited amount of time upon receiveing a petition <br /> from the property owners. <br /> 5. That the two and one half acre development district be from the Urban <br /> Service District: to the southern and eastern city limits; north to a <br /> line running from Co. Rd. 33 in the northeast part of the city <br /> running directly west to Highway 169; and then following Co. Rd. 33 <br /> from Highway 169 to the western city limits. <br /> 6. That the remaining area of the City (northern part) be in the one <br /> unit per ten acre zone with serious consideration being given to some <br /> form of cluster development. <br /> MOTION BY ESTELLE GUNKEL TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE THREE <br /> DIFFERENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS FOR ELK RIVER AS SHOWN ON THE <br /> 2/8/88 MAP. MOTION SECONDED BY ARLON FUCHS. MOTION PASSED <br /> UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> It was noted that this map shows the Municipal Service District, the Two <br /> . and One Half Acre District, and the One Per Ten Acre District for <br /> residential development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.