Laserfiche WebLink
MEETING OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TASK FORCE <br /> HELD AT THE ELK RIVER CITY HALL POLICE STATION CONFERENCE ROOM <br /> • MONDAY FEBRUARY 8, 1988 <br /> Members Present: Chairman Dick Hinkle, Estelle Gunkel, Arlon Fuchs, Ted <br /> Cornelius, Cliff Lundberg, Marilyn Van Patten(8:00 p.m. ) , <br /> Bill Birrenkott, Pat Klaers, City Administrator; Steve <br /> Rohlf, Building & Zoning Administrator; Bob Wournos & Zack <br /> Johnson, Planning Consultants; Terry Maurer, City Engineer; <br /> Dave Sellergren, City Attorney <br /> Guest Present: Rita Johnson, Planning Commission Member <br /> Members Absent: Gene Schuldt, Ron Black, Duane Kropuenske, Bob Morton <br /> 1. Chairman Hinkle called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. <br /> 2. TED CORNELIUS MOVED TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 11, 1988 GMPTF MINUTES AS <br /> PRESENTED. ARLON FUCHS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED <br /> UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> 3. Review of 1/11/88 GMPTF Recommendations <br /> The City Administrator reviewed with the Task Force the three approved <br /> recommendations from the 1/11/88 GMPTF minutes. These three <br /> recommendations dealt with the future residential development of the <br /> community. The first recommendation dealt with the undertaking of a <br /> • comprehensive feasibility study to evaluate the extension of the <br /> municipal utilities to the west side of Elk River between the two rivers. <br /> The second recommendation dealt with restricting development within the <br /> municipal urban district until such development could hook up to <br /> municipal utilities. The third recommendation dealt with the <br /> transferring of properties from the municipal service area to the two and <br /> one half acre development district. <br /> The GMPTF concurred that the recommendations as documented in the 1/11/88 <br /> minutes were an accurate reflection of the intentions of the Task Force. <br /> IftwiMMEMP <br /> 4 Discussion on Remaining Elements of the Residential Development Plan <br /> City Administrator indicated that the Task Force had requested <br /> recommendations from the Staff on the remaining elements of the <br /> residential development plan. These remaining elements included four <br /> questionable areas that were within the urban service district, the area <br /> of the community that should be allowed to develop in a two and one half <br /> acre manner, and the area of the City that should be required to develop <br /> at a lower density of one unit per ten acres. <br /> Staff reviewed with the GMPTF a map dated 2/8/88 that showed some changes <br /> from the previously reviewed 1/11/88 development districts map. The Task <br /> Force concurred with the Staff recommendation that: <br /> • <br />