04-16-1984 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r- . City Council Minutes April 16, 1984 Page Seven COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO CONTINUE THE SUSPENSION OF THE DINO'S PIZZA ON-SALE LICENSE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS ALL MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL WERE PRESENT. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO LIFT THE SUSPENSION OF THE ON-SALE BEER LICENSE AND TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCIL- MEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION TIED 2-2. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL AND MAYOR HINKLE OPPOSED. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REVOCATION OF THE DINO' S PIZZA ON-SALE BEER LICENSE UNTIL THE MAY 7, 1984, CITY COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0. It was the consensus of the City Council to continue the suspension until May 7th City Council meeting. 13. East Main Street Plans and Specifications and Date for Public Hearing Councilmember Gunkel indicated that approximately one year ago, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the feasibility study for the East Main Street improvement project. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that the improvement project was from Highway #169 to Railroad Drive and would be tied in with the Highway #10 improvement project and the signal installation at Main Street and Highway #169. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that the plans and specifications were ordered in August but that the project had never been ordered. The City Administrator indicated that as the original public hearing on the pro- ject was in June of 1983 and the project had not been officially ordered, the City Council must re-hearthe project prior to the award of the bid. Mr. John Gilbertson, Engineer from Consulting Engineers Diversified, indicated that the bid schedule as proposed in his memo tCll,J:heMayortahd,JCity; GouniHl. should not cause a problem with the construction of the project. I Mr. Norm Kastendick indicated that he was re~resenting his mother, a homeowner at the corner of Gates Avenue and Main Street regarding the easement necessary for the construction of the Gates Avenue and Main Street intersection. Discussion was carried on regarding the City's 66 foot easement. Mr. Gilbertson indicated that the required easement from Mrs. Kastendick is necessary flor cont"' struction but would be returned to green space. Mr. Kastendick also indicated that Mrs. Kastendick was also concerned about the relocation of the utility pole and telephone junction box and whether or not her tree would be destroyed in the relocation of the pole and construction of the turn lanes and intersection. The City Administrator indicated that the easement required from Mrs. Kastendick is approximately 50 square feet. Further discussion was carried on regarding the relocation of the power pole. Councilmember Gunkel suggested the City engineer consider the possibility of installing another pole to then allow the wires to miss the tree in Mrs. Kastendick's yard.