06-20-1983 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Minutes June 20, 1983 Page Four COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST FROM THE CITY'S SIDEYARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT BY MR. RICHARD LINDQUIST OF 13504 l79TH AVENUE NORTHWEST. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 7. Pearson Administrative Subdivision Request - Public Hearing The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Robert Pearson of 5630 l64th Lane in Anoka has requested an administrative subdivision to consolidate a legal size lot and a substandard size lot into one lot in the Oak Hills First Addition. The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Pearson plans to utilize the total property as one parcel. The City Administrator further indicated that Mr. Pearson's request presents no particular problem, and as such, it is recommended that the City Council grant the administrative subdivision as requested. Mayor Hinkle opened the Public Hearing. No one appeared for or in opposition of the administrative subdivision request. COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION REQUEST BY MR. ROBERT PEARSON FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF A LEGAL SIZE LOT AND A SUB- STANDARD SIZE LOT IN THE OAK HILLS FIRST ADDITION. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSEp 4-0. 8. Marty Administrative Subdivision Request - Public Hearing The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Hubert Marty and Mr. George Carlson of Princeton, Minnesota, have requested an administrative subdivision for lot 24, block 2, of the Ridgewood East subdivision. The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Marty's request is to subdivide lot 24 into three parcels which would enable Mr. Marty to sell each side of the duplex already built and leave a third parcel available for future development. The City Administrator further indicated that the current zoning for the specific parcel is R-2, and as such, the future development proposed would be allowed. The City Administrator indicated that the City staff finds that each of the three resulting parcels meets the City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, and therefore, it is recom- mended that the City Council approve the subdivisi n request. Discussion was carried on regarding the specific location of the ubdivision request. Further discussion was carried on regarding the ho esteadingof each side of the two family dwelling, and if it could be rented if ach side was not individually sold. Councilmember Gunkel questioned the possibi ity of subdividing the site that is proposed for future development at the sam time this subdivision is being accomplished. The City Administrator indica ed that it is easier to subdivide the parcel after the two family dwelling is constructed, because of the surveying that must be done after the build'ng is complete. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE ADMINI TRATIVE SUBDIVISION REQUEST BY MR. HUBERT MARTY FOR LOT 24, BLOCK 2, RIDGEWOOD EAST SUBDIVISION. COUNCIL- MEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PA SED 4-0.