Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br />NOVEMBER 4, 1985 <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER ~NGSTROM MOV <br />SUBDIVISION WITH THE STIPUL <br />FEE BE PAID OF THE RAW LAND <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />PAGE 3 <br /> <br /> <br />APPROVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE <br />THAT A 10Y. PARK DEDICATION <br />FOR THE 2.5 ACRE PARCEL. <br /> <br />The Buildin51 and Zonin51 Admi Iistr'ator- eXF'lained the 10Y. F"ar'k <br />dedicatior. fee. <br /> <br />The Buildin51 an Zonin51 Admi <br />Beaudr-y who liv~s at 13289 <br />administrative subdivision <br />property located on lot <br />Subdivision. He further s <br />the prop~r-ty at the pres <br />Beaudry would like to divide <br />separate dwellin51 units a <br />The Buildin51 and Zonin51 Adm <br />doin51 so, Mr. Beaudry mus <br />sewer- system for each parcel <br />must be a fir-ewall which <br />units. <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle opened the p <br />for or in opposition of <br />r-equest. <br /> <br />Mayor- Hinkle clos~d the <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVE <br />SUBDIVISION BY MR. MELVIN <br />LOT 20, BLOCK 2, RIDGEWO <br />STIPULATIONS THAT AN INDI <br />PROVIDED FOR EACH PARCEL <br />ONE HOUR FIRE WALLS BE <br />THE MOTION <br /> <br />6.5 Si5lnage on Water Tower <br /> <br />6. Consideration of Request for Administr-a~ive Subdivision from <br />Mr-. Melvin Beaudrv <br /> <br /> <br />THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />listrator- stated that Mr. Melvin <br />iverviewDrive is requesting an <br />to sF.lit an existins F"ieceof <br />O. Block 2. Ridsewood East <br />ated that ther-e is a duplex on <br />nt tim~ and indicated that Mr. <br />the land which wouJd create two <br />d two separ-ate parcels nf l.nd. <br />nstrator further stated that in <br />provide an individual well and <br />of land. and further that the~e <br />would separate the two dwellins . <br /> <br /> <br />hearins. There was no one <br />administrative subdivision <br /> <br /> <br />hear'in5l. <br /> <br />TO APPROVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE <br />BEAUDRY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON <br />D EAST SUBDIVISION WITH THE <br />IDUAL SEWER SYSTEM AND WELL BE <br />OF LAND AND FURTHER THAT (TWO) <br />ROVIDED TO SEPARATE THE DUPLEX. <br />PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />Councilmember Engstr-om nnt d that he was pleased with the <br />way the water tower turne out. but felt the Elk Head and <br />the wording were too small and indicated he felt it was <br />almost impossible to make 0 t the meaning of the words from <br />a distance. Discussion was heldregardins the scale of the <br />drawing on the water tower, and it was the consensus of the <br />City Council that the City Administrator check with Edson <br />Stansfield to see if something could possibly be done about <br />enlarging the lettering and the elk head. <br /> <br />