My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.1 - 3.3
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1998
>
07-14-1998
>
3.1 - 3.3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2018 2:49:34 PM
Creation date
4/16/2018 2:49:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Mr. Pat Klaers <br /> July 10, 1998 <br /> Page 5 <br /> ■ Street Widths <br /> The Developers are proposing that the City Standard 32-foot wide residential <br /> street width be modified to allow 26-foot wide street widths on cul-de-sacs. <br /> The actual cul-de-sac bubble would be built to the City Standard. Several <br /> City staff members with different perspectives have reviewed this issue. The <br /> Fire Chief's perspective was that if this narrower street was to be allowed, at <br /> least one side of the street needs to be signed "No Parking," to ensure that <br /> emergency vehicles can access the cul-de-sacs at all times. Phil Hals, Street <br /> Superintendent, was concerned about snow storage in heavy snowfall years. <br /> He has indicated that in heavy snowfall years, the Public Works Department <br /> may not get the streets cleared from curb line to curb line. With a narrower <br /> street, any snow left on the edges will narrow that street even further. My <br /> concern with the street width proposal is one of precedent setting. You will <br /> recall that it was a long, hard struggle to get a street width of 32 feet as a <br /> standard. My concern is that a narrowing of cul-de-sacs in this development <br /> will have to entail a policy change to allow it in other developments. This may <br /> lead to other arguments of low-volume streets at narrower widths. Since the <br /> rights-of-way are the standard 60-foot width, narrowing of the street does not <br /> • provide any benefit for the saving of trees, due to the homes being closer. In <br /> fact, in an effort to save trees, the Developers are suggesting a change in the <br /> setback from 30 feet to 25 feet. Given all of these comments, I would <br /> recommend that the proposed street narrowing be rejected, and the <br /> development be required to build the City Standard 32-foot wide street widths <br /> throughout the plat. <br /> Street A, the main corridor from the southeast corner to the northwest corner <br /> of the development, is provided with a 70-foot right-of-way, and proposed to <br /> be a 36-foot street, due to the much higher volumes of traffic anticipated on <br /> this route. <br /> • Number of Cul-de-Sacs <br /> This project contains 14 cul-de-sacs, one of which is a private road serving <br /> the northwest townhouse development. Two of the cul-de-sacs, Street I and <br /> Street L, appear to be slightly longer than the City Ordinance of 700 feet. In <br /> the staff review of this plat, the issue was raised about the number of cul-de- <br /> sacs. The City Ordinance does not speak to a maximum number of cul-de- <br /> sacs, but rather a maximum length. There are a number of competing <br /> issues, one being the ease of maintenance, the other being trying to create <br /> neighborhoods and higher-priced housing. We would suggest that the <br /> Developer review a plat for the opportunity to eliminate some of the cul-de- <br /> sacs. The one specific recommendation we have is to look at extending <br /> Street F to meet Street S, eliminating the Street F cul-de-sac. This will also <br /> • provide a secondary route for the middle of the development to exit through <br /> the southwest onto CSAH 13 (Tyler Street). <br /> Howard R. Green Company <br /> O:\PROD\800111j\0240\111-0804.july.doPONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.