Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />January 7, 1985 <br />Page Six <br /> <br />of the Chamber of Commerce and the City Council. Mayor Hinkle indicated that in <br />the essence of time, he felt it would be a benefit to the City to not change <br />architects at this time because of the time required in interviewing new <br />architects. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she questioned the consideration of a new <br />architect and further indicated that she did not have a problem with the design <br />as was submitted by the architect, Mr. Jack Boarman. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schuldt indicated that he does not have a clear-cut answer as to <br />why the referendum failed and therefore, was supportive of a City survey to <br />obtain citizens' input regarding the City facilities. <br /> <br />Councilmember Engstrom indicated that he was also in favor of the survey to <br />obtain citizens' input regarding the City facilities. <br /> <br />Councilmember Willimas indicated that he felt the citizens should have more in- <br />formation, specifically, models of what the proposed facility or remodeled <br />facility would look like. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council to authorize Jack Boarman to do a <br />citizens' survey regarding the City facilities and to review the survey <br />questions with the City Council prior to actually conducting the survey. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS MOVED TO AUTHORIZE JACK BOARMAN ARCHITECTS TO CONDUCT <br />A SURVEY OF THE ELK RIVER RESIDENTS BY TELEPHONE QUESTIONING THE CITY FACILITIES <br />REFERENDUM AND TON CONTINUE THE ARTHITECT'S CONTACT WITH THE CITY IN AN EFFORT <br />TO LEAD UP TO A CITY FACILITIES REFERENDUM IN THE SPRING. COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM <br />SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />B. PUD TIF <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated that he and John Gilbertson of Consulting <br />Engineers Diversified, would be meeting with the School Superintendent, Mr. <br />George Zabee and Mr. Lloyd Brutlag, regarding the possibility of locating a <br />water tower on school property. The City Administrator indicated that the <br />specific site and design of the water tower are the two elements left to <br />complete the feasibility study. The City Administrator further indicated that <br />he has met with the Monticello City Manager and talked with the Princeton <br />City Manager regarding tax increment financing. The City Administrator indicated <br />that tax increment financing is not necessarily difficult, it is just time- <br />consuming to go through the necessary steps. The City Administrator further <br />indicated that he would be meeting with Mr. Sellergren, the City's Atrorney, <br />regarding establishing the tax increment financing district. General discussion <br />was carried on regarding the process of tax increment financing and the schedule <br />required to compTe-te the work. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she is concerned with the timing of the <br />project, as the City has ninety days to accomplish the tax increment financing <br />district after the building permit is issued. <br /> <br />