Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Minutes <br />December 18, 1989 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />lots and that it will be harder to assess the people for road <br />improvements at a later date than it would be to assess them as the <br />lots are created. <br /> <br />Mayor Tralle indicated that if the impact of the existing road is <br />more than it can handle without upgrading the road the Council may <br />want to consider not allowing the subdivision. Councilmember Schuldt <br />stated that there are other roads in the City which are more highly <br />impacted than Monroe Street and they have not been upgraded. He <br />indicated that he did not feel this was an issue. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION <br />REQUESTED BY JOHN HANSEN TO SUBDIVIDE AN 80 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND INTO <br />THREE PARCELS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 <br />OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 33, RANGE 26 WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: <br /> <br />1. THAT THE VENDOR ON THE CONTRACT FOR DEED ON THE PROPERTY COSIGN <br />THE APPLICATION FOR THE LOT SPLIT. <br /> <br />2. THAT $700 OF PARK DEDICATION FEES BE PAID PRIOR TO THE <br />RECORDING OF THIS LOT SPLIT. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />THAT MR. HANSEN PROVIDE THE CITY WITH THREE NEW LEGAL <br />DESCRIPTIONS, ONE FOR EACH TEN ACRE PARCEL AND ONE FOR THE <br />REMAINING FORTY ACRE PARCEL. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4. THAT MR. HANSEN PROVIDE THE CITY WITH A FULL 33 FEET FROM <br />CENTER LINE EASEMENT FOR MONROE STREET. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />4.3 Condi tional Use Permit to Amend the Elk Ri ver Plaza PUD <br />A~reement/Public Hearin~ <br /> <br />Steve Bjork, Zoning Assistant, indicated that Triple S Investment, <br />owner of the Big Wheel Building, has requested a conditional use <br />permit to amend the Elk River Plaza PUD agreement to allow commercial <br />recreational facilities for Parcel F, Lot 5, Block 1, Elk River Plaza <br />2nd Addition. Mr. Bjork indicated that if the amendment to approve <br />commercial recreational facilities for Parcel F is approved, the <br />following could also be located wi thin the building; weightlifting <br />clubs, bowling alley, theater, billiards hall and swimming pool. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Bob Morton, Planning Commission representative, indicated that the <br />Planning Commission recommended approval with a 5-2 vote. Mr. Morton <br />indicated that he was one of the dissenting votes and his reason for <br />opposing the issue was that the original conditional use permit for <br />the building allowed retail commercial uses only. Rita Johnson, <br />Planning Commission representative, indicated that five of the people <br />on the Planning Commission voted in favor of the request. She <br />indicated that the Planning Commission thoroughly reviewed the seven <br />standards for granting a conditional use permit and indicated their <br />reasons for recommending approval are listed in the Zoning <br />Assistant's memo dated December 18, 1989. She further indicated that <br />