Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Elk River City Council Minutes <br />April 21, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the water service <br />suggested that some <br />contractor to see if <br /> <br />from <br />of <br />they <br /> <br />the property <br />the residents <br />can get better <br /> <br />line to the home. Terry Maurer <br />get together and contact a <br />rates as a group. <br /> <br />Terry Maurer stated that another issue which was brought to the City's <br />attention was partial prepayment of assessments. He indicated that the <br />City Council also considered this request at its last Council meeting <br />and authorized partial prepayment prior to certification of the <br />assessment to the County. He indicated that this is as lenient as a <br />City can be because of what is allowed by State law. <br /> <br />Terry Maurer informed the residents that an error was made in the <br />assessment schedules that were mailed to the residents regarding <br />payment of interest due and payable with the first installment. He <br />explained that the first year of the assessment only shows one month of <br />interest and should show 13 months of interest. Terry also informed <br />the residents that the entire assessment may be paid without interest <br />until it is certified to the County. <br /> <br />Terry Maurer explained that the assessment schedules <br />payment period of 10 and 15 years according to the <br />He indicated that the City will allow payment of up <br />requested by the property owner. <br /> <br />were run for a <br />assessment amount. <br />to 20 years if <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Pat Klaers, City Administrator, explained that the interest shown on <br />the assessment schedule mailed to the property owners is 8.25%. He <br />explained that state law used to limit cities to charging no more than <br />1.5% over the bond sale interest, however, this law has been repealed. <br />He stated that the City of Elk River's policy has been to stay at the <br />1.5% interest rate over the bond rate. He stated that the City must <br />charge enough to cover expenses but not to make a profit. He further <br />explained that the 1.5% charged over the bond sale interest is used to <br />pay for delinquent assessments, to cover costs of deferrals and also to <br />cover costs such as minor project changes and cost overruns. He stated <br />that if there is any money left from the 1.5%, the money is then <br />transferred into the Capital projects Fund and used to pay for other <br />projects or components of the ongoing project. <br /> <br />The City Engineer indicated that the City has received some questions <br />regarding the Western Area project and the fact that the existing rural <br />lots are not paying for trunk water main or trunk sewer main costs. <br />Terry Maurer explained that the City Council is treating the Westwood <br />Area in the same manner as there are no trunk sewer or water charges <br />being charged to the Westwood residents. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Terry Maurer concluded that the recommendation made by staff for the <br />assessment method, after looking at the five scenarios and after <br />talking to the residents at the open house, was Assessment Method #1 <br />which assessed properties on a front footage basis. Terry Maurer <br />explained that after reviewing the market value appraisal by Peter <br />PatChin, there were six properties that were assessed slightly more <br />than the market value could support and requested the City Council to <br />reduce these assessments to a limit at which the market value could <br />support. <br />