Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Minutes <br />March 23, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />GJJ~__MJ!I i n t~t..r a tOL-J1.m~!!j,,-1l <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated that the County Board has requested a <br />Ci ty representative on the Board of Canvass. He stated that the Board <br />of Canvass for the presidential election would be held on April 10 at <br />1 : 00 p. m. Vice Mayor Hol mgren volunteered to attend the Board of <br />CanvaRs. <br /> <br />6.1. Stey.~_RQhl[JJI1Lding and ZonllliLAdministrator Annual Repor-.t <br /> <br />Steve Rohlf explained that hi s annual report focused on building, <br />zoning, and environmental activities in 1991. Steve Rohlf indicated <br />tllat the 1991 total valuation for construction was over $19 million. <br />Steve Rohlf explained that the lack of single family lots is the reason <br />for the low number of single family building permits issued in 1991. <br />He explained that commercial and industrial development is in the same <br />situation aR single family growth. He felt that sewer and water needs <br />to he extended to accommodate commercial and industrial businesses. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Steve Rohlf discussed some of the goals for the Building and Zoning <br />Department. One of the goals he discussed was computerization for the <br />department. He indicated that it is his desire to computerize all <br />building permits by address. It was the consensus of the City Council <br />to have the Building and Zoning Administrator investigate this <br />possihi llty. <br /> <br />Steve Rohlf addressed the issue of storm drainage in his annual <br />report. He indicated that he would like to identify all the drainage <br />areas in Elk R.iver a.s a starting point to a storm drainage plan. He <br />stated that an end product would be a complete plan on how to address <br />storm drainage in the City of Elk R.iver. Payment for this type of a <br />proj ect. waR discussed by the Counc i1 . <br /> <br />Steve Rohlf also discussed the sign ordinance. He indicated that there <br />is a possible need for an amendment to the sign ordinance because of <br />the size of signage in reference to the size of the buildings. It was <br />the consensus of the Counci 1 to authorize the Planni ng Commission to <br />review the City's sign ordinance. <br /> <br />The City Councl 1 thanked the RuUding and Zoning Administrator for the <br />presentation. <br /> <br />6.] .n. Dl~erfield TIT and IV Erosiqn <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kropuenske indicated that he has become aware that there <br />are two or three lots that are eroding due to a slope in the Deerfield <br />III area. He stated his concern about the City's liability due to the <br />exposur(~ of underground wi res and the depth of the erosi on. The <br />Building and Zoning Administrator explained that this matter would be <br />brought to the Building Official's attention. Council member Holmgren <br />requested that Cliff Skogstad look into this situation and report back <br />to the Coune j] . <br /> <br />6.2. <br /> <br />Fi re J2~artment Annll1!L~~ort <br />