My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.7. SR 10-18-1999
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1999
>
10/18/1999
>
6.7. SR 10-18-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:25 AM
Creation date
3/9/2005 3:19:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
10/18/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Memo to City CouncillP 99-9 <br />October 18, 1999 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />large wetland to create an improved "public" access to the park and to provide an <br />opportunity for walkways around the wetland. <br /> <br />In February 1999, a concept for Seven Oaks was presented to the Park and <br />Recreation Commission for review and in general the concept was acceptable to the <br />Commission contingent on the following criteria: <br /> <br />. That the trail be installed as part of the development. <br />. That the dedicated parkland be dry land with the trail on the dry land. <br />. That there be a 20 foot minimum distance maintained between the trail and <br />back yard property lines. <br /> <br />The proposed park has 360 feet of street frontage at a point where the land slopes <br />steeply, over 20%, towards the wetland and where the land area is too constricted <br />for lots. The park frontage is unusable for anything but a trail access and providing <br />an improved "public" entrance into the park and framing views of the wetland. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Although the proposed park is generally compatible with the park concept plan, it <br />does not meet the minimum criteria of the February 10, 1999, Park and Recreation <br />review. Upon site plan review, staff found that the proposed trail does not meet the <br />requested 20 feet minimum distance from the rear lot lines of Lots 15 and 16, Block <br />2. Staff also believes the space between the lots and the wetland appears to be <br />"pinched" and negates the benefits of the greater street frontage and public nature <br />of the proposed entrance to the park. Furthermore, the small knoll where Lots 15 <br />and 16, Block 2, are proposed might provide an opportunity for a small play <br />structure or meeting place near the road and entrance to the park. <br /> <br />The actual amount of land proposed for park dedication is 3.48 acres or roughly 5% <br />of the development. As per ordinance, the City can require up to 10% of the land for <br />park dedication. Staff recommends that an additional .58 acres of land, Lots 15 and <br />16, Block 2, be added to the land being dedicated as park for a total land dedication <br />of 4.05 acres or 5.8% of the land and the remaining park dedication be collected in <br />cash in lieu of land. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Recommendation <br /> <br />On August 11, 1999, the Park and Recreation Commission concurred with staffs <br />recommendation and recommended that the developer dedicate 4.05 acres of land <br />for park with the remaining dedication to be paid in cash at the amount required by <br />the City at the time of final plat. In addition, the Commission recommended that <br />the developer construct a bituminous trail with the public improvements in the first <br />phase of the development and be reimbursed as per City policy. <br /> <br />Planninf! Commission <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />At the August 24, 1999 Public Hearing, residents Ron and Yvonne Halpaus, 19563 <br />Landers Street, expressed concerned about damage to their trees due to proposed <br />grading within the drip line (See attached letter). Planning Commissioners <br /> <br />\ \elkriver\sys \shrdoc \planning\stevewen \ccmmo \p99-9.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.