My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1. SR 10-17-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2016
>
10-17-2016
>
7.1. SR 10-17-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2016 1:11:33 PM
Creation date
10/14/2016 1:08:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
10/16/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Elk River, Minnesota <br />SBH Properties, LLC Tax Abatement Project <br />September 23, 2016 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />per square foot (13,312). As a side note, the applicant’s materials include square footage of 16,312, as opposed to <br />actual square footage of the project of 13,312. Based on the annual rents estimated to be received from the <br />$5/square foot for 13,312 of square feet the project would generate an estimated annual rental income of $66,560 to <br />support the debt service payments. The estimated annual debt service payments for the first mortgage ($1,049,774 <br />with a 20 year term and 4.25% interest rate) would be $78,007. Annual abatements from both the City and County <br />totaling $14,856 would provide sufficient income to make annual debt service payments. The estimated annual <br />payments for the equipment loan ($351,000 with a 6 year term and 4.55% interest rate) would be an additional <br />$66,958 and not projected to be supported by any annual abatement revenues. <br /> <br />As stated tax abatement does not statutorily require a “but for” analysis to determine if the project would proceed <br />without assistance; however a city, county or school district may grant a tax abatement, by contract or otherwise, of <br />the taxes imposed by the city on a parcel of property, which may include personal property and machinery, or defer <br />the payments of the taxes and abate the interest and penalty that otherwise would apply, if: <br /> it expects the benefits to the city of the proposed abatement agreement to at least equal the costs to the city <br />of the proposed agreement or intends the abatement to phase-in a property tax increase, as provided in <br />clause (2)(vii); and <br /> it finds that doing so is in the public interest because it will: <br />o increase or preserve tax base; <br />o provide employment opportunities in the political subdivision; <br />o provide or help acquire or construct public facilities; <br />o help redevelop or renew blighted areas; <br />o help provide access to services for residents of the political subdivision; <br />o finance or provide public infrastructure; <br />o phase-in a property tax increase on the parcel resulting from an increase of 50 percent or more in <br />one year on the estimated market value of the parcel, other than increase attributable to <br />improvement of the parcel; or <br />o stabilize the tax base through equalization of property tax revenues for a specified period of time <br />with respect to a taxpayer whose real and personal property is subject to valuation under <br />Minnesota Rules, chapter 8100. <br /> <br />The applicant has stated the project would increase the City’s tax base and provide additional employment <br />opportunities. The applicant’s submittal includes a projected sources and uses of funds, project description, <br />anticipated number of jobs created, 2014 and 2015 financial statements and 3 years of projected statements (2016- <br />2018). The one year cash flow showing the results with and without abatement assistance include the annual rental <br />income (rent per square foot and leasable square feet) from the proposed project and estimated debt service <br />payments on the building (20 year term at 4.25%) and equipment (6 year term at 4.55%) loans. There are two <br />scenarios, one with assistance and one without that also include the $200,000 forgivable loan, with a projected return <br />on equity calculation for each. As stated previously, the tax abatement would provide additional annual cash flow to <br />the project to assist with increasing the projected return on equity for the owner, as well as assisting with providing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.