6.5 PCSR 03-22-2016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The proposed use does not involve activities that would be detrimental to surrounding properties. Expected increases to traffic will be consistent with the environmental review completed as part of River Park plat, and improvements identified by the study have been completed. 6. lY>ill not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. The project will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. 7. Wlill fully comply with all other requirements of this Code,' din any applicable requirements and standards for the issuance of a license orpermit to establish and operate the proposed use in the ciy. The project, as proposed, will fully comply with all other requirements of this code. Preliminary Plat City ordinance section 30-375 outlines the required findings for approval of a Preliminary Plat. 7. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the tinning regulations (article VI of this chapter) and conforms in all respects with all requirements of this Code, including the -on' regulations and this article. The proposed subdivision may only be approved with a recommendation of approval for the associated PUD. Without the PUD the subdivision is not consistent with prior approvals or current zoning regulations. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable general and specialitied cit', count', and regional plans, including, but not limited to, the ci y's comprehensive development plan. The subdivision is consistent with all applicable plans. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding and drainage are suitable for the ype and density of development and uses contemplated. Staff continues to work with the applicant to finalize drainage calculations and address wetland impacts. The physical characteristics of the site support the proposed development. 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage transportation, erosion control and all other services, facilities and improvements otherwise required in this article. Staff continues to work with the applicant to finalize storm drainage concerns. If a recommendation of approval is made, approval of the drainage plans should be included. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage. The subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of a court. The subdivision does not conflict with easements of record. N:ADepartments\Community Development\Plane ng\Cas-e Files\P\P 16-02 Miske Meadows\P 16-02 SR PC 3-22-2016 Paxmar - Miske Meadows.docx