My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2015
>
09-08-2015
>
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2015 8:11:45 AM
Creation date
9/4/2015 7:59:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/8/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E-cigarettes: an evidence update <br /> <br />51 <br />smoking cessation (30-day abstinence) in a sample of smokers enrolled in a web-based <br />cessation programme in the US with three-month follow-up. Pearson illustrated how the <br />relation between using EC to quit and successful smoking cessation depended on the <br />factors that were adjusted for and how the data were analysed, finding that under some <br />conditions EC use was related to being less likely to quit and in others there was no <br />relationship. The authors concluded that caution needs to be exerted when interpreting <br />observational studies of the effects of EC use on smoking cessation. <br /> <br />Borderud et al., 2014 [52] examined whether any use of EC in the past 30 days was <br />related to smoking cessation outcomes in a group of cancer patients enrolled in a <br />smoking cessation programme in the US. When treating all smokers who dropped out of <br />the study as smoking cessation failures, the authors found that any use of EC in the last <br />30 days was related to being less likely to quit; however, this treatment of the data may <br />have been problematic because more EC users than non-users dropped out of the <br />study. No relationship between EC use in the last 30 days and smoking cessation was <br />observed when drop-outs were excluded from the analyses. One potential problem with <br />this study is the measure of any EC use in the last 30 days, as this could range from <br />using an EC once in the last 30 days to using an EC daily for the past 30 days. As <br />illustrated [16, 44, 45] and discussed in previous studies [51], measurements of EC use <br />that do not fully capture frequency of use may influence the relation between EC use <br />and smoking cessation. As with studies in the previous section, the Borderud study <br />started with smokers who had tried EC but did not stop smoking. This, of course, <br />seriously reduces the chance of detecting a positive effect. <br /> <br />Summary of findings <br />Recent studies support the Cochrane Review findings that EC can help people to quit <br />smoking and reduce their cigarette consumption. There is also evidence that EC can <br />encourage quitting or cigarette consumption reduction even among those not intending <br />to quit or rejecting other support. It is not known whether current EC products are more <br />or less effective than licensed stop-smoking medications, but they are much more <br />popular, thereby providing an opportunity to expand the number of smokers stopping <br />successfully. Some English stop smoking services and practitioners support the use of <br />EC in quit attempts and provide behavioural support for EC users trying to quit smoking; <br />self-reported quit rates are at least comparable to other treatments. The evidence on <br />EC used alongside smoking on subsequent quitting of smoking is mixed. <br /> <br />Policy implications <br />o Smokers who have tried other methods of quitting without success could be <br />encouraged to try EC to stop smoking and stop smoking services should support <br />smokers using EC to quit by offering them behavioural support. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.