Laserfiche WebLink
Updated Research and Concept Options for Downtown North of Hwy 10 <br /> October 4,2004 HRA Meeting <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> • Issue <br /> The next step in the redevelopment planning process is the development of concept options. <br /> It is important to consider existing research of the area before considering the concept <br /> options. <br /> Updated Research <br /> Staff has been working to update existing research of the area to reflect the Study Area. The <br /> following three analyses were completed in 2001 for use in the Downtown Redevelopment <br /> Plan. <br /> • Market Analysis <br /> • Historical Significance Analysis <br /> • Building Condition Analysis <br /> The results of the updated analyses are as follows: <br /> • The Market Analysis has not changed. Support still remains for a shift to higher <br /> density residential and office/service versus retail in the Study Area. <br /> • One area and five specific homes were added to the Historical Significance Analysis. <br /> • 108 buildings were added to the Building Condition Analysis. Of the 108 buildings, <br /> 57%were considered to be in "good" condition, 31%were considered to be in "fair" <br /> • condition, and 11%were considered to be in "poor" condition. <br /> More details regarding the updated analyses are provided below. <br /> Market Analysis <br /> This analysis was completed by Maxfield Research, Inc. in April of 2001. The analysis <br /> examined the potential for housing,retail and office development in Downtown Elk River <br /> through 2010,which included land use recommendations as indicated in the attached <br /> Primary Redevelopment Sites map. <br /> In 2001,Maxfield summarized downtown north of Hwy 10 as follows: "The Northern Area <br /> features a mix of retail and service businesses, offices, and housing east of Jackson Avenue, <br /> and industrial uses west of Jackson Avenue. While the Northern Area can benefit from its <br /> convenient access to the Highway 169 commercial areas,redevelopment potential is limited <br /> by poor visibility from Highway 10 and no frontage along the River". <br /> In addition, some of Maxfield's 2001 conclusions and recommendations for the area include <br /> the following: <br /> • Area is better suited for redevelopment to office and services than to retail <br /> • Area not suited for additional retail, since it does not have great access and visibility <br /> from Highway 10 and most potential retailers would likely shy away from this area, <br /> in favor of better visible shopping space in the Core CDB or along Highway 169 <br /> • <br />