My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.0. SR 12-10-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
12/10/2001
>
8.0. SR 12-10-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:31 AM
Creation date
4/29/2004 6:51:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/10/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. <br /> <br />Roadway F <br /> <br />Roadway F provides a continuous north-south corridor along the <br />eastern border of Elk River in order to pull some traffic away from <br />T.H. 10, T.H. 169 and the T.H. 169/Main Street intersection. It uses <br />the Jarvis Street right-of-way to the north from T.H. 10, then a new <br />roadway segment connecting Jarvis Street to Fillmore Street. <br />Fillmore Street right-of-way is used from that point north to County <br />Road 12. County Road 40 is shown relocated further west, aligned <br />with Fillmore Street, but intersecting County Road 13 in <br />approximately the same location that is presently does. This <br />realignment removes three 90 degree curves, making County Road 40 <br />a more desirable route. <br /> <br />Figure 7 is a map of forecasted ultimate ADT volumes with all the <br />above mentioned roadway network additions in place. <br /> <br />PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION PLAN <br /> <br />The transportation plan proposed herein is based on travel demand forecasts with a horizon <br />of ultimate or saturation, development in the City of Elk River. This horizon is many years <br />in the future; how many depends upon a wide range of factors. <br /> <br />Assumptions were used through the process that led to development of the plan. Because <br />of the distant horizon and the assumptions made in virtually every step of the process, it is <br />imperative that the assumptions be reviewed periodically for their continued validity as the <br />City grows. When necessary, adjustments should be made to the plan recommendations. <br />It is important to recognize that the form and condition of a transportation system can drive <br />land development, but also that land development can cause changes in a transportation <br />system. Therefore, development proposals should be checked for consistency with the <br />transportation plan, and likewise the plan should be adjusted as necessary to remain <br />representative of land use conditions in the City. <br /> <br />The proposed ultimate functional classification system for the City of Elk River, minus <br />future residential collectors in areas still to develop, is shown in Figure 8. Included are the <br />proposed roadway additions described in the previous section. The main focus of this system <br />is to develop a City-wide minor arterial network that provides adequate area coverage and <br />enough traffic moving capacity to handle vehicular traffic in an ultimate development <br />scenario. As mentioned earlier in the report, roadway additions alone will not solve the <br />anticipated capacity problems. In the previous section, many roadway and intersection <br />improvements were identified. The recommended improvements all progress toward the <br />creation of a functional classification system whose roadway designs and traffic control are <br />consistent with the characteristics in Table 4 of this report. <br /> <br />Following is a summary of the most critical existing roadway segments and intersections, <br />and recommended improvements: <br /> <br /> -30- 230-~sr-g0 <br />CTP-230.156 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.