Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />i <br />Position Statement <br />Telecommunications and Broadband Law <br />The Minnesota Governor's Task Force on <br />Broadband recently released its Annual Report <br />and Broadband Plan, including recommendations <br />for the 2013 legislative session. The Report noted <br />that Minnesota is lagging in meeting its goals. <br />Unfortunately, the recommendations made in this <br />report are unlikely to lead to the meeting of those <br />goals. <br />The idea of re- writing state telecom law was a <br />priority of the Ventura administration but, even <br />with agreement among various parties that state <br />law was antiquated, the discussion never gained <br />much steam, largely because the telecom companies <br />decided the law was just fine after all. Efforts have <br />been made over the years to remove or reduce the <br />super- majority referendum requirement to build a <br />municipal telephone exchange, but have withered <br />in the face of vociferous opposition. <br />Municipal involvement in the telecommunications <br />field has been a hot - button topic over the years. <br />The recent report mentioned "public- private <br />broadband projects" but makes no specific mention <br />of how to foster such projects. The state needs to <br />12/ 2013 State Position Statements <br />be more open to helping local government develop <br />partnerships, if it is ever to reach its broadband <br />goals. <br />Cities have proven capable of providing a full <br />range of telecommunications services over <br />the years. Counties are providing cutting - <br />edge communications services. The Southwest <br />Minnesota Broadband Services project (a <br />consortium of eight cities) shows how ordinary <br />people, working through their local governments, <br />can provide high - quality voice, video and data <br />service at reasonable prices. <br />After much work, a similar project in Renville <br />and Sibley counties has recently been stymied <br />due to concerns over the ability of city- county <br />partnerships to issue bonds. The project itself has <br />been enthusiastically supported by rural and city <br />interests and was well on its way to construction <br />before last- minute legal concerns were voiced. <br />This is just the type of project the state should be <br />fostering. <br />A perfect example of public - private partnerships <br />exists in the electric utility industry. Despite <br />animosities, largely in the formative years, <br />municipal, investor -owned and cooperative <br />utilities jointly invest in capital- intensive projects <br />on a regular basis. Utilities do this because they <br />recognize the level of capital needed to improve <br />service to their customers, and realize an effective <br />way to raise the needed capital is to partner with <br />others willing to invest, regardless of philosophical <br />differences. <br />MMUA Position <br />The Legislature should expand the ability of <br />local governments to partner with others in <br />providing telecommunications services. Enacting <br />guidelines to allow public - private investment in our <br />broadband infrastructure would similarly benefit <br />citizens of Minnesota. <br />