My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.5. ERMUSR 03-19-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2013
>
03-19-2013
>
5.5. ERMUSR 03-19-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2013 2:08:10 PM
Creation date
4/26/2013 1:47:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
3/19/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANORANIIA419 <br />Legitimate Savings. The current <br />program does not recognize much of <br />the legitimate energy savings that do <br />or could occur from utility efforts. <br />Life -of- measure savings. <br />Energy savings from adopting <br />most energy efficiency technologies <br />continue to accrue over the useful <br />life of the measure. But the CIP law <br />recognizes the energy savings of a <br />given measure only in the year in <br />which it is installed or adopted. For <br />measures with useful lives of more <br />than one year, the energy savings <br />accruing during those years should <br />be counted towards savings goals. <br />System improvements. <br />Current law provides a greater incentive for <br />utilities to create energy savings from measures <br />affecting the amount of energy consumed by <br />the customer than from measures that could be <br />taken to prevent energy loss from generation, <br />transmission and distribution required to serve <br />the customer. These savings have the same <br />environmental value and should be credited on <br />an equal basis with behind - the -meter energy <br />savings. <br />Educational Efforts. <br />Much of the potential energy savings from <br />utility efforts could come from the changing <br />behaviors of customers. Utilities cannot make <br />those changes happen without communicating <br />the benefits of making energy- conscious <br />Position Statement <br />0 <br />decisions to customers. These educational • <br />efforts are among the most effective means of <br />creating energy savings, but they are hard to <br />quantify and are not recognized under the CIP <br />program. If the program could recognize these <br />savings, utilities would have an incentive to <br />place a higher emphasis on consumer education, <br />which is critical to achieving long -term changes <br />in energy usage patterns. The energy education <br />efforts of public power communities should <br />be given credit for energy savings deemed to <br />have occurred as result of consumer education <br />efforts. If savings credits are not acceptable, the <br />Department of Commerce should be required <br />to run a state -wide education program from the <br />proceeds already assessed to utilities. <br />2013 State Position Statements / 11 <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.