Laserfiche WebLink
proposed within the expanded Landfill. The proposed structures at the expanded Landfill may <br />include additional leachate storage/treatment structures, a modil=led or additional landfill gas to <br />energy building, and additional or alternative scale locations. The specific location and design of <br />any additional structures, such as a modified or additional landfill gas to energy facility or future <br />household hazardous waste facility, has not been determined, but would be in accordance with <br />the terms laid out in the May 25, 2011 Agreement. <br />2.3.9 OUTDOOR STORAGE <br />No additional outdoor storage is proposed. Storage will occur within existing structures or those <br />proposed. <br />2.3.10 WETLAND DELINEATION <br />No wetlands are located within the expanded Landfill. This was approximated by conducting a <br />desktop review of GIS data layers and aerial photographs. The following tools were used for the <br />desktop determination: <br />• The Sherburne County Soil Survey <br />• A review of the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) <br />• A review of 10 foot contours on the USGS topographic map <br />2.3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT <br />The initially-proposed 73.4-acre expanded Landfill required and was subject to a mandatory <br />Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the requirements of Minn. R. 4410.4400, subp. <br />13(E) for expansion by 25 percent or more of a previous capacity of a MSW disposal facility for <br />100,000 cubic yards or more of waste fill per year. The EIS was completed in 2005 and approved <br />in 2006. MPCA was the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for that .EIS, the purpose of which <br />was to evaluate and disclose information about the significant environmental effects of the <br />proposed action. The EIS prepared for the initially-proposed 73.4-acre expanded Landfill <br />concluded that environmental impacts would likely be minimal and management and mitigation <br />standards were proposed that met or exceeded regulatory standards. <br />2.3.12 ALL OTHER INFORMATION AS DETERMINED BY CITY STAFF <br />No additional information was requested as a part of the May 25, 2011 Agreement or during a <br />meeting with the Environmental Administrator and City's environmental consultant on June 6, <br />2011. <br />2.4 LAND USE AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS <br />The City Code does not address the process or requirements for land use amendments. The Elk <br />River Comprehensive Plan (dated August 2004) provides several statements related to <br />implementing and amending the plan including the following: <br />State Law sets forth a variety of requirements for putting the Comprehensive P/an into effect (p, <br />3-8). <br />The application of zoning districts and the specific regu/ations must support the objectives of the <br />Comprehensive Plan (p, 3-8). <br />The regu/ations for each zoning district show/d be reviewed to determine if they fit with the intent <br />of the Comprehensive P/an (p, 3-9), <br />Elk River Landfill SDA Section 2-7 <br />Land Use Application E KR~~µADi`` ~~'-~~~~ <br />