My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2011
>
08-08-2011
>
5.2. SR 08-08-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2011 9:51:07 AM
Creation date
8/5/2011 9:47:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/8/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i~ <br />i~ <br />i~ <br />i~ <br />ii <br /> <br />Table 21- 2 -Intersection Level of Service Ranges <br /> <br /> <br />A <br />. • ~ <br />-; <br /><_ 10 1• • ~ <br />•, <br /><_ 10 <br />B 10 -20 10 -15 <br />C 20 -35 15 -25 <br />D 35 - 55 25 - 35 <br />E 55 -80 35 -50 <br />F >80 >50 <br />Source: HCM <br />' LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes <br />referred to as "approaches") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It <br />should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases <br />where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on <br />the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a <br />' two-way STOP condition to an all-way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized <br />intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major <br />road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on <br />' minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive <br />effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. <br />Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to <br />' construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the <br />benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection <br />' or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest <br />acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable <br />minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations <br />or distances, or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. <br />The LOS analysis for the 171St Avenue Area AUAR was performed using <br />' Synchro/SimTraffic: <br />• Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) <br />methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an <br />input database for turning-movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal <br />design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize <br />signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is <br />' transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. <br />• SimTraffic is amicro-simulation computer modeling software that simulates <br />each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to <br />traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model <br />simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as <br />' City of Elk River <br />Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review <br />July 2011 Page 61 of 84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.