5.2. SR 08-08-2011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' • A 16-inch diameter watermain should be extended south from the existing 16- inch diameter watermain within the TH 10 right-of-way at 171St Avenue. The 16-inch diameter watermain should be extended through the west portion of the development ideally within aCity-owned right-of-way. It could then be ' downsized to a 12-inch diameter on the east side of TH 10 within the 165th Avenue right-of-way. The 12-inch diameter watermain should then be looped within the eastern portion of the development as shown on Figure 13-2 for ' Scenario 1 or on Figure 13-3 for Scenarios 2 and 3. The 12-inch diameter watermain should then be connected to the existing 16-inch watermain within 171St Avenue. The remaining looping could be accomplished with 8-inch ' diameter watermain as shown on the attached Figures 13-2 and 13-3. As the City does not have a Comprehensive Water System Plan, the trunk watermain was sized in accordance with typical development recommendations. • Any abandoned wells found within the study area will be sealed in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) guidelines. • As the City currently does not have a Wellhead Protection Plan (WHPP), a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) has not been established. A ' DWSMA will be detailed for future wells as they are constructed and when the City is called into the WHPP program by the MDH. t 14. Water-related land use management districts. Does any part of the project involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100-year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? ®Yes ^ ' No If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land ' use restrictions. shoreland District: There are no designated shoreland zoning districts within the study area. Floodplain District: The Mississippi River has a designated FEMA floodplain ' adjacent to the study area shown on Figure 14-1. No impacts to the floodplain are anticipated with any of the development scenarios. ' Wild and Scenic River District: The Mississippi River is designated as wild and scenic within and adjacent to the study area as shown on Figure 14-1. Development within the study area within this district will need to meet the ' requirements of the City's Wild and Scenic River Protection ordinance. Water-Related Land Use Management Districts Mitigation Measures • Any development is required to meet the standards in the Ciry's Wild and Scenic River Protection Ordinance and Floodplain Ordinance. ' City of Elk River Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review July 2011 Page 37 of 84