Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Memo to the Mayor and City Council/P 96-13 <br />July 21, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />.................-....-------------.-----.......... <br /> <br />. Proposed plan was inconsistent with the adjacent development and may <br />have had adverse impacts on the reasonable development of the project <br />. The plan was inconsistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan to <br />encourage subdivision design which protects wooded areas and natural <br />contours <br /> <br />Since that time, staff has worked with Good Value Homes and the developer <br />of Lafayette Woods to modify the plat in order to address the above- <br />mentioned concerns. <br /> <br />Proiect Overview <br /> <br />The proposed lots in the plat range in size from the R1c minimum lot size of <br />11,000 square feet up to 53,000 square feet. All of the lots have a minimum <br />depth of 135 feet and a frontage of at least 80 feet. With the reduction in lots <br />from the original proposal, the density of the project has decreased from <br />approximately 2.4 units per acre to 1.8. This reduction in density achieves a <br />density comparable to the Lafayette Woods project to the north and <br />northwest. <br /> <br />Natural Characteristics <br /> <br />The north third of the property is heavily wooded with mature hardwoods. <br />Revisions to the plat have included extending the lot depths adjacent to <br />Lafayette Woods to increase the likelihood of saving the mature trees in this <br />area. Lot depths have increased so the lots are anywhere from 175 feet in <br />depth up to 212 feet. <br /> <br />Existinl! Home <br /> <br />Previously, the preliminary plat included subdividing the property <br />immediately adjacent to the existing home on the property. The most recent <br />proposal leaves the existing home on a parcel which is approximately 3 acres <br />in size. Earlier plans had included a short cul-de-sac extending off of Proctor <br />Road to serve the property immediately adjacent to the existing home. The <br />County has denied this access and recommended the property be served <br />internally from a local street. With that recommendation it became difficult <br />to serve Lot 21 with an internal street and to further subdivide the property <br />around the home. Therefore, Lot 21 will remain as a larger parcel and will <br />be consistent with the County's recommendation to minimize access points <br />along the County road, as well as accomplishing the Planning Commission <br />and City Council's concerns of further tree removal to create developable lots <br />in this area. One of the conditions for approval will be to add a deed <br />restriction on Lot 21 to prevent any further subdivision of the property. <br /> <br />f: \shrdoc \council\p96-13x2.doc <br />