My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.0. SR 01-21-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
01/21/1997
>
3.0. SR 01-21-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:43 AM
Creation date
7/24/2003 6:31:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
who visited that park during the past twelve months. Lions Park <br /> ranked second at a usage rate of sixty-six percent. Facilities <br /> located at the schools drew visitors from fifty-one percent of <br /> the households in Elk River. Handke Outdoor Ice Arsna and the <br /> softball complex attracted members of about forty percent of the <br /> households in the city during the past ysar. Woodland. Trails <br /> Park, virtually undeveloped, was visited by only ten percent of <br /> the sample's households. While Orono Park is the pre-eminent <br /> facility in the park system, Lions Park and school-based <br /> offerings also serve large segments of the community. <br /> <br /> Park visitors were queried about the types of recreational <br /> facilities they used most frequently. Most respondents reported <br /> passively walking around the park they visited. But, the <br /> swimming beach was used on at least an occasional basis by sixty <br /> percent of the households in the city. Softball fields and play <br /> equipment served about forty percent of the households.. The <br /> picnic peri!lions, sliding hills, and soccer fields possessed a <br /> smaller, but significant audience within Elk River. In <br /> comparison with other communities, Elk River residents use the <br /> park and recreational facilities in atypically high numbers. <br /> <br /> The City received kudos for its maintenance and upkeep of ~ <br /> the park facilities. Eighty-eight percent approved of the c~ty's '" <br /> efforts, while only eight percent expressed ~isamproval. As for ~ <br /> unmet needs, only trails were mentioned frequently enough, at <br /> seven percent, to warrant further study. <br /> <br /> The residents were asked their opinion of a more extensive----' <br />trail system to link the city's neighborhoods. The concept was <br />favored by a large seventy-six percent majority. However, when <br />the subject of property tax increases to pay for its development <br />was raised, half of the support changed opinions: a forty <br />percent to thirty-eight percent negative verdict occurred. There <br />would be substantial difficulty, consecuentlv, in passing a <br />referendum at this time. ° ' <br /> <br /> A nearly similar pattern emerged on the question of a <br />downtown river walk. Seventy-three percent favored the concept. <br />But, if property tax increases would be required to fund the <br />construction, then a forty-four percent to thirty-seven percent <br />plurality emerged in favor of the project. This project would be <br />viable at the polls, but a highly effective and aggressive <br />campaign would be needed to carry the day. <br /> <br /> Residents felt strongly, however, about the characteristics <br />of any trail system in Elk River. Seventy-six percent felt it <br />should serve both pedestrians and bicyclists. Seventy percent <br />wanted to see the recently p~r~hased abandoned railroad corridor <br />developed into a component of the system. And, surprisingly, <br />one-half of the residents would grant the City an easement if the <br />trail system ran by their property. Reinforcing these results, <br />trails were also narrowly designated the priority for <br />development, edging smaller neighborhood parks and outdistancing <br />larger community playfields. The ~oncept, then, is highly <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.