My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.0. SR 01-21-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
01/21/1997
>
3.0. SR 01-21-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:43 AM
Creation date
7/24/2003 6:31:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
popular; financing is the major sticking point. <br /> <br /> Participation in recreation programs was also at a <br /> relatively high level. Thirty-two percent of the households <br /> reported children participating in a youth program during the <br /> past year. The most popular program was soccer, a result unique <br /> to this community. Satisfaction with youth programs was <br /> virtually unanimous. By ten-to-one, residents also felt that <br /> current offerings met the needs of their households. Youth <br /> programs, then, are both well utilized and well regarded. <br /> <br /> A similar pattern emerged in the evaluation of adult <br />recreational programs. Twenty percent of the sample reported <br />participation during the past twelve months. Softball was the <br />most popular program. Dissatisfaction with any offering was <br />almost non-existent. And, seventy-six percent of the residents <br />felt that the programs met their needs. This is one .of the <br />strongest evaluations the researchers have found to date. It <br />should be no surprise that a two-to-one majority, sixty-one <br />percent to thirty percent, favor a joint agreement with the <br />School District for providing, programs rather th%n the City <br />offering programs on its own. <br /> <br /> Consistent with the high regard of local recreational <br />programs, only eleven percent of the sample reported household <br />members travelled elsewhere to recreate' This "leakage,, is <br />between one-half and one-third the norm. Anoka County sports <br />programs seemed to be the out-of-town draw. But, even so, almost <br />eighty percent of the users of out-of-Elk River programs would <br />transfer to city-sponsored offerings if they were comparable. <br />These results, however, should not be construed as indicating <br />that residents used Elk River facilities exclusively: sixty-one <br />percent of the sample reported visiting other county parks during <br />the past year. And, a fifty-one percent to thirty-two percent <br />majority feel that Sherburne County should develop a regional <br />park system to augment other nearby facilities. While venturing <br />to facilities at other locations, then, residents clearly prefer <br />their local facilities to other offerings. <br /> <br /> A series of facilities which could be added to the park <br />system was listed to gauge residential interest. A nature trial <br />with explanatory sign posts engendered the most interest, with <br />seventy-four percent indicating members of their households would <br />be "very likely" or "somewhat likely" to use it. An outdoor <br />swimming pool drew an interested level of sixty-five percent. A <br />nature area with an educational interpretive center ranked next <br />with sixty-six percent of the households expressing interest. <br />And, play equipment was the fourth most popular facility at <br />forty-four percent likelihood to be used. These preferences are <br />clearly consistent with the household recreational patterns <br />discussed earlier. <br /> <br /> Attitudes toward the value of a.park and recreational system <br />are very strongly held. Seventy-four percent of the citizenry <br />felt that a good city park and recreational system would increase <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.