My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.6. PCSR 06-08-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2010
>
06-08-2010
>
5.6. PCSR 06-08-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2010 11:00:21 AM
Creation date
6/4/2010 3:30:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
6/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONCEPT EVALUATION <br />• <br />-~ <br />i <br />~i <br />~~ $~~ <br />. r <br />,. - <br />.. <br />~~ - - <br />~~: <br />r - ~. <br />*~~_ <br />Scenario ~: <br />» Signals as the long term access solution <br />» Interchange is so far out that planning leaves development in <br />limbo <br />» Signals at existing ~7ist and existing 65th <br />» Consensus of the City of Elk River was that planning for the "end- <br />game" scenario of an interchange makes the most sense for the <br />long term benefit o f the community <br />• <br />;' <br />Scenario z: <br />» Interim signals at ~7~st Avenue and 65th Avenue <br />» Long term interchange located at the location identi f ied in the IRC <br />prepared by MNDOT <br />» Conflicts with existing and near term development <br />» Consensus o f the City of Elk River was an interchange location south o f <br />65th fails to benefit the existing business in the study area and is too <br />far removed from the Northstar commuter rail station. <br />» Long-term questions on whether or not Cargill would ever develop the <br />adjacent land were another concern. <br />>< --€ <br />` ,r, I <br />_~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.