7.1. SR 04-16-2012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REQUEST FOR ACTION TO ITEM NUMBER Ma or and Ci Council 7.1 AGENDA SECTION MEETING DATE PREPARED BY Public Hearin s A ri116, 2012 Chris Leeseber ,Park Planner-Planner ITEM DESCRIPTION REVIEWED By Request by Tim Peterson for Conditional Use Permit and erem Barnhart, Plannin Mana er Private Kennel License, 11760 193`d Ave NW, Case No. CU 12- REVIEWED BY 05 Cal Portner, Ci Administrator ACTION REQUESTED A. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request to have a private kennel with the following conditions: 1. As a Conditional Use Permit is not a Building Permit, the applicant shall apply for all required permits. 2. The private kennel shall be limited to five (5) animals over the age of 6 months. Additional animals will require an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit. 3. Animal waste shall be disposed of per Section 10-9. 4. The applicant shall receive a private kennel license from the city. 5. All animals must be licensed and vaccinated. 6. All animals shall be on a six (6) foot or shorter leash when outside of the kennel. 7. No more than two (2) animals per supervisor shall be allowed outside of the kennel. 8. All dog waste shall be cleaned up immediately when dogs are off of the subject property. 9. No dogs designated as dangerous or potentially dangerous are allowed to be kept at the kennel and keeping of a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog shall be grounds for revocation. 10. Fence along the south property line shall be opaque. B. Approval of a private kennel license to Tim Peterson based upon approval of the Conditional Use Permit. PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their April 11, 2012, meeting and recommended approval, with one additional condition (#10), of the request by a 4-1 vote. The one vote against the request cited opposition by neighbors, interpreting strictly the criteria of conditional use. During the public hearing, seven individuals spoke on the request. Of the seven, four were in favor of the request, two were opposed to the request, and one was the applicant. Those that were in favor of the request (a couple living there for 10+ years) cited that they have never had issues with the applicant's dogs, the applicant's dogs are quieter than most of the dogs in the area, the dogs by their nature of what they do have to be well behaved and quiet. One neighbor indicated that he was not even aware that the applicant had five dogs. ~~rlEwEO sr N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\CUP\CU 12-OS Peterson Private Kennel\CU 12- ~~~ OS_CC.docx