Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SPECIAL MEETING OF <br />THE ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION <br />HELD AT ELK RIVER CITY HALL <br />TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Members Present: Chair Anderson, Lemke, Offerman, Ropp, Scott, and Westgaard <br /> <br />Members Absent: Commissioner Stevens <br /> <br />Staff Present: Michele McPherson, Director of Planning; Scott Harlicker, Senior <br /> Planner; Chris Leeseberg, Planner; Debbie Huebner, Recording Secretary <br /> <br /> <br />1. Call Meeting To Order <br /> <br /> Chair Anderson opened the workshop portion of the meeting at 6:30 p.m. in the Upper <br />Town Conference Room. <br /> <br />2. Gateway Business Center Neighborhood Meeting <br /> <br /> Property owners present: John Weicht, Rick Morrell, Ronald Ebner, Penny LaPlante and <br />Dean Jacobs, representing Cargill. <br /> <br /> Director of Planning Michele McPherson provided background information regarding the <br />City-owned property proposed to be developed as Gateway Business Park. She identified <br />the owners of the properties surrounding the site. Ms. McPherson explained that the zoning <br />of the property is split, with part being zoned Highway Commercial and part Light <br />Industrial. The City Council and EDA have indicated that they would like to see the City <br />maintain as much commercial zoning as possible. The site has been offered to Great River <br />Energy for their campus, but a decision has not been made at this time. It is the City’s intent <br />to move forward with a development plan for the site while waiting for GRE’s decision. <br /> <br /> Ms. McPherson reviewed the two layout concepts, noting that they are very similar due to <br />the location of the wetlands. Also, she noted that the street must line up with Ulysses Street <br />to the north. The property to the west and south is currently zoned C3 Highway <br />Commercial, and the property to the east and north is zoned I1 Light Industrial, which <br />would allow light manufacturing uses with limited outdoor storage. Ms. McPherson stated <br />that the Cargill property will remain Agricultural Research. She noted that the difference <br />between Option A and Option B is the small cul-de-sac, which would allow access to <br />Powell’s property, and differences in the lot layout. She explained that construction of the <br />roads as shown would depend on whether or not the neighboring property owners show <br />interest in development. Ms. McPherson stated that the City Council has also discussed the <br />possibility of selling off the commercial piece to a developer. <br /> <br /> John Weicht, property owner - stated that he purchased the parcel of property located <br />south of the Ebner Bait Shop property to develop it for Highway Commercial uses, and that <br />he would be interested in petitioning for the street as soon as possible. <br /> <br /> Chair Anderson asked for clarification on the road shown on the drawings as a dashed line. <br />Ms. McPherson explained that this road would provide a future connection to 165 Avenue <br />th <br />through the RDF property. She noted that the RDF owners have shown some concern <br /> <br />