My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-2005 PC MIN - SPECIAL
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2000 - 2009
>
2005
>
08-09-2005 PC MIN - SPECIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:27 AM
Creation date
9/8/2005 11:09:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
8/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special Planning Commission Minutes <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />August 9, 2005 <br />--------------------------- <br />regarding the location of this road due to security issues. Commissioner Scott suggested the <br />possibility of this road acting as a frontage road, if the Highway 10 access is closed at 165 <br />th <br />Avenue. Ms. McPherson stated that the City is not sure at this time where the State highway <br />interchange will end up being placed. <br /> <br /> Ronald Ebner, owner of property at 17015 Highway 10 – Asked what would happen to <br />the proposal if GRE decides to purchase the property. Ms. McPherson stated that it is her <br />understanding they will make a decision tomorrow (August 10). She stated that if GRE <br />th <br />decides to purchase the site, they also may be interested in purchasing land from private <br />owners. Mr. Weicht asked if the road to access his site would still be constructed. Ms. <br />McPherson stated that accommodations would be made to provide access to the adjacent <br />sites. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Offerman asked if the RDF trucks would then need to travel on Twin Lakes <br />Road, if the Highway 10 access at 165 Avenue was closed. Ms. McPherson stated that she <br />th <br />was not sure what would happen at 171 Avenue and Highway 10, and that the access could <br />st <br />possibly be built further south. Chair Anderson asked if his understanding is correct, that <br />either or both of the Highway 10 accesses at 165 and 171 Avenues could be closed. Ms. <br />thst <br />McPherson stated yes, that it is possible but that the City has no information at this time. <br />Commissioner Offerman stated that it would be nice to know that information in planning <br />the development of the Gateway property. Ms. McPherson stated that the City will have <br />better answers when more detailed transportation studies are completed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ebner asked if the large swamp would be drained or filled. Ms. McPherson explained <br />that it is very difficult to obtain approval for filling wetlands and they must be replaced at a <br />ratio of 2 to 1. She noted that the City does have some banked wetland credits that they <br />could use. She stated that in drafting the concepts, staff tried to avoid the wetlands as much <br />as possible. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Westgaard stated that the location of the Highway 10 access points is a very <br />significant issue, since the transit station traffic needs access to the highway. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Scott stated that there are a significant access points that need to preserved, <br />and recalled that this was done in the metro area. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Lemke asked if the EDA or the City owns the Gateway property. Ms. <br />McPherson stated that the City owns the property, but the are asking for the EDA’s input <br />due to the Light Industrial component. Commissioner Lemke asked if the City will propose <br />the closing of any accesses. Ms. McPherson stated no, that that would be done by MnDOT. <br /> <br /> Penny LaPlante, representing Cargill, 10383 165 Avenue – asked how far the transit <br />th <br />station is from the Gateway Business Park property. Ms. McPherson stated that it is <br />approximately ¼ mile north. <br /> <br /> Mr. Weicht asked if the wetlands have been delineated by the City. Ms. McPherson stated <br />yes, that the information was taken from the CAD drawings provided by the City Engineer. <br />Mr. Weicht stated that he felt the amount of wetlands shown was very aggressive from what <br />is actually on site. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ebner asked if a service road is constructed, would all the accesses be taken out. Ms. <br />McPherson stated that if a service road is constructed, MnDOT would eventually take out <br />the Highway 10 accesses. She explained that the project could be constructed in phases, in <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.