My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1 ERMUSR 11-09-2005
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2005
>
11-09-2005
>
6.1 ERMUSR 11-09-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 1:11:21 PM
Creation date
8/6/2018 11:13:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
11/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Elk River <br /> Municipal Utilities <br /> 13069 Orono Parkway phone: 763.441.2020 <br /> Elk River,MN 55330 Fax.763.441 8099 <br /> October 25, 2005 <br /> ' To: Elk River Municipal Utilities commission <br /> Jerry Takle <br /> Jim Tralle <br /> John Dietz <br /> ' From: Theresa Slominski <br /> ' Subject: Outsourcing of Bill Printing <br /> At the last commission meeting, in my staff update, I shared that I was looking into the <br /> possibility of outsourcing our bill printing. Looking at this possibility came about as a <br /> result of a presentation on Bill Flash at the Power Manager(ERMU's billing and <br /> accounting software provider) Users Group conference in September. Bill Flash is an <br /> 1. organization whose business is printing and mailing bills for organizations. Power <br /> Manager was contacted by Bill Flash and then formed a partnership. The partnership <br /> entailed customizing the software to create a print file that could be sent to Bill Flash for <br /> ' the actual printing and mailing function. As a result of this partnership, the special <br /> programming has been completed and it provides a smooth transition for those utilizing <br /> this service. <br /> ' There are a couple of reasons that I would like to implement this service at ERMU. The <br /> first reason would be saving $20,000 by not having to invest in a new folding and <br /> ' stuffing machine. We would also be able to save on the mailing machine replacement <br /> because we wouldn't need to purchase such a high volume machine if we weren't using it <br /> for bills. <br /> The second reason would be a better utilization of staff time, switching from a focus of <br /> the manual handling of paper to reviewing and analyzing the bills before they go out. <br /> ' This would result in more accurate bills and fewer adjustments. <br /> I want to address an earlier(much earlier) proposition for better utilization of staff time <br /> for the billing process. It is my understanding that the proposition for converting to <br /> cycled billing was done with the desired benefit of easing the workload involved with the <br /> bill processing and printing. My observations are that cycled billing won't reduce the <br /> amount of time involved but it will redistribute the intensity involved(still definitely a <br /> benefit.) Offsite printing will reduce the amount of time involved and it won't pose any <br /> difficulty in still converting to cycled billing in the future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.