Laserfiche WebLink
Elk River <br />Municipal Utilities <br />130(9 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430 <br />Elk River, MN 55330-0430 <br />UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br />Phone: 763.441.2020 <br />Fax: 763.441.8099 <br />TO: FROM: <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission David Berg -Water Superintendent <br />John Dietz, Chair Troy Adams, P.E. - Director of Operations <br />D 1 Thom son, Trustee <br />MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br />Janu 11,2011 4.1 <br />SUBJECT: <br />Review of City Ordinance 78-51 WATER USE RESTRICTIONS and Elk River Municipal <br />Utilities' 2009 RESOLUTION IMPOSING WATER USE RESTRICTIONS WITHIN THE <br />CITY OF ELK RIVER. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />In July 2009, as authorized under City Ordinance Section 78-51, the Utilities Commission <br />adopted a resolution imposing water use restrictions. The motion to approve this resolution was <br />carried by a 3-0 vote. The scope of 78-51 WATER USE RESTRICTIONS was reviewed by the <br />Utilities Commission in September 2010. It was then proposed to the City Council in October <br />2010 to amend the scope of geographical area subject to water use restrictions from the City <br />water service area to all of the City limits. The Council chose not to make any changes to the <br />ordinance at that time. At the December 2010 Utilities Commission meeting, the Commission <br />directed staff to bring back for review the water use restriction resolution that had been adopted <br />in 2009. <br />DISCUSSION: <br />The attached 2009 RESOLUTION IMPOSING WATER USE RESTRICTIONS WITHIN THE <br />CITY OF ELK RIVER did not required an amendment to the ordinance and is permanent until <br />revoked or amended by Utilities Commission resolution. The Utilities had water restrictions in <br />place prior to the adoption of this resolution. However, the adoption of this resolution enabled <br />the enforcement of these water restrictions through Ordinance 78-51 PENALTIES. City <br />ordinances 78-51 and 78-52 are attached for Commission reference. <br />Part of the current discussion has focused on the concern that the current water restrictions may <br />be perceived as "crying wolf' during periods when not suffering drought conditions. Based on <br />the information presented below as well as included by reference, the current water restrictions <br />should not be perceived as sending a false alarm, but rather as conserving important resources: <br />water supply, system capacity, system capability, and cost to efficiently run the water <br />distributions system. It should also be noted that during drought conditions, the prudent course <br />of action would likely include more drastic sprinkling restrictions. <br />