My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. ERMUSR 01-11-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2011
>
01-11-2011
>
4.1. ERMUSR 01-11-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2011 11:42:11 AM
Creation date
1/10/2011 11:42:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
1/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Because of Elk River's geographical location on the rim of the Mt. Simon-Hinckley Aquifer <br />"bowl" centered under the Twin Cities metro area, water use and/or misuse are always a concern <br />for ERMU and our customers. In 2008, ERMU had a study done to identify water supply <br />alternatives for our City. Although this report does not directly address the issues of sprinkling <br />and water use restrictions, but it does show how precious and sensitive our water resources are in <br />Elk River. This report is attached as information. Revoking or amending ERMU's resolution <br />invoking water use restrictions may seem like it would have an insignificant impact to the <br />Utilities. However, this is the tip of the iceberg of an important topic. Whether it is because of <br />drawdown or aquifer contamination, our alternatives sources of water for the City are limited and <br />could be costly. <br />In addition to water usage concerns during drought conditions, the invoking of water use <br />restrictions serves other equally important functions. The "odd-even" and "time of day" <br />sprinkling restrictions communicate our commitment to the conservation of our precious <br />resources. This is consistent with City of Elk River's Energy City Board's position on <br />conservation. <br />The use restrictions help to mitigate the volatility in pumping flow rate. This is similar to the <br />demand side management used to control air conditioner use during the summer. By controlling <br />the peaks, the system can more cost effectively sized. This helps to proactively control system <br />costs that would inevitably be borne by the customer. The methodology is not unique to Elk <br />River. As noted at the December 2010 Utilities Commission meeting, approximately 65% of the <br />71 cities surveyed by the Suburban Utilities Superintendent Association (SUSA) employ similar <br />water use restrictions. These water use restrictions are not too "progressive" but rather the norm. <br />These types of proactive water conservation methods also become important when the need <br />comes to increase our water use appropriations from the Department of Natural Resources <br />(DNR). As you may recall, in September 2006, ERMU submitted to the DNR a Conservation <br />and Emergency Management Plan for Elk River Municipal Utilities Water System. This was an <br />important step in the DNR amending our water use permit increasing our water use <br />appropriations. Attached for reference is the letter from the DNR approving the requested <br />increase in water use appropriations. <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />Based on the above discussion, included materials, and staff expertise, the recommend is to make <br />no change to the current resolution invoking water use restrictions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.