My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.4. ERMUSR 08-10-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2010
>
08-10-2010
>
5.4. ERMUSR 08-10-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2010 4:34:43 PM
Creation date
8/6/2010 4:34:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
8/10/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River <br />Municipal Utilities <br />13069 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430 <br />Elk River, MN 55330-0430 <br />UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br />Phone: 763.441.2020 <br />Fax: 763.44 L8099 <br />TO: FROM: <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Theresa Slominski -Finance Director <br />John Dietz, Chair <br />Jerry Gumphrey, Vice Chair <br />D 1 Thom son, Trustee <br />MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br />Au st 10, 2010 5.4 <br />SUBJECT: <br />Commercial Customers Procedure for Earl Identification of Potential Default <br />BACKGROUND: <br />At the July Commission meeting second quarter write-offs were presented for review. Out of <br />that review a request was made for management to meet with staff and create a procedure for <br />early identification of potential default of the commercial customers. <br />DISCUSSION: <br />A core group of staff (Troy Adams, Director of Operations; Greg Scherber, Assistant Office <br />Manager; Michelle Martindale, Credit and Collections Specialist; and myself) met initially to <br />brainstorm and determine the best course of action to meet this request and have the following to <br />present. We determined that our policy is adequate, but the internal procedures could be <br />enhanced. <br />The first item noted was the necessity to have a list or report to work from each month. We <br />don't have the capability of creating such a list by customer class, but we do have an Accounts <br />Receivable report mechanism in place that, with some "tweaking", can provide a customer <br />balance listing that would identify accounts that hadn't paid by the due date of the given month <br />and have a designated $ balance (we initially looked at anything greater than $500.) The list <br />could contain high use residential customers and apartment buildings and so an additional review <br />to pare down the list is necessary. This list would then be reviewed by the Credit and Collections <br />Specialist who would identify the customers that should be followed up with. <br />Depending on the number of customers to follow up with, the Credit and Collections Specialist <br />would contact them or create a list for any member of this core group to contact. This contact <br />would be an opportunity to introduce ourselves to the customer, let them know that we are <br />watching their payment activity, find out what their needs or issues may be, and establish a point <br />of contact for any future calls. We will be contacting these customers on their first missed <br />payment (in a cycle of approximately 20 days) and so want to be perceived as concerned diligent <br />professionals at this point, not vigilante payment hounds. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.