My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.4. ERMUSR 08-10-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2010
>
08-10-2010
>
5.4. ERMUSR 08-10-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2010 4:34:43 PM
Creation date
8/6/2010 4:34:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
8/10/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
If the customer is in financial difficulty at this point, we should be able to identify that. We could <br />demand a deposit at this point but the likelihood of being able to collect it would be sltm tf they <br />are already in financial trouble. We could get a guarantee signature at this point and hope that <br />there aze assets to cover it in the event of default. We would have to closely monitor the payment <br />activity following the initial contact. Per our policy, disconnection is possible simply for failure <br />to pay. Per statute, and our policies, proper notice has to be given. This initial phone call would <br />fall into that notice category and effectively "speeds up" the timeframe for disconnection, if that <br />becomes necessary. Ultimately, disconnection is our best defense, and that carries with it some <br />potential public relations issues with commercial accounts, especially if they are the hospitality <br />industry. Once a customer has been disconnected for nonpayment, a deposit is required in order <br />to reinstate service, and so that may be the point at which we collect it. <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />No action required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.