My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. PCSR 05-11-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2010
>
05-11-2010
>
5.2. PCSR 05-11-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2010 12:39:26 PM
Creation date
5/10/2010 9:25:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
5/11/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
516
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case File: CU 10-08 <br />Page 7 <br />ERL CUP <br />City of Elk River <br />• Section 58-171(8) <br />(8) 200 feet from the nearest property which is not located within ME SWF -Solid <br />Waste Facilities Overlay Zoning District. <br />C. State Regulations (Minn. Rules, Part 7035.2815, Subp. 5(Cl <br />(C) Any new fill area at a land disposal facility must be located at least 200 feet from the nearest <br />property line, unless otherwise approved by the commissioner based on existing filling <br />procedures, existing site structures, the facility design, compliance boundaries, and existing land <br />restrictions. <br />Zoning and Comprehensive Plan <br />According to the Landfill, the 200-foot buffer zone which they propose to fill with solid waste was <br />not entirely within the City's SWF Zoning District until the City Council's Apri119, 2010 action <br />zoning the entire Landfill into the SWF and ME Overlay Districts. Similarly, at present the eastern <br />edge of the 200-foot buffer zone proposed to be filled is not currently guided "landfill" on the Land <br />Use Map element of the 2004 Comprehensive Plan. However, staff has proposed, and the City <br />Council will consider on May 17, 2010, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan that will <br />designate the entire Landfill property as "Landfill". <br />The April 19, 2010 zoning action and the proposed May 17, 2010 Comprehensive Plan amendment <br />were not proposed by staff so that the Landfill could place solid waste in the buffer zone. These <br />actions were proposed and taken in order to implement the City's, and we believe, the Landfill's <br />long time understanding and intent that the entire Landfill property between the rail trail and <br />Highway 169 be zoned and guided to allow Solid Waste Facilities. <br />However, the fact that the Landfill property is, or soon will be, correctly zoned and guided does not <br />mean that there is a right to place solid waste in the 200-foot buffer zone. The requested <br />amendment to allow this must still meet the requirements of City Code and State law, including the <br />standards for issuance of a Conditional Use Permit and the requirements of the City's Solid Waste <br />Facilities Ordinance. <br />Analysis <br />The Application to expand the Landfill by extending the area approved for the deposit of Solid <br />Waste into the existing 200 foot buffer zone on the southern boundary of the Landfill appears, from <br />an overall engineering standpoint, to meet the design requirements for expansion of the Landfill. <br />However, the proposed expansion will result in the state-mandated 200 foot buffer zone being <br />located on adjoining property outside of the Solid Waste Facility Zoning District, and would require <br />that significant infrastructure components, including groundwater monitoring wells, gas monitoring <br />probes, a service road, and potentially, surface water management facilities,be located outside of the <br />SWF Zoning District. This raises a number of concerns regarding the consistency of the proposed <br />amendments with State regulations, the City's Solid Waste Facilities Ordinance, and the Standards <br />for Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. <br />With respect to state regulations, location of the state-mandated 200-foot buffer zone onto adjoining <br />property appears to be inconsistent with the state regulation that requires any new fill area to be <br />S:\Community Development\Planning Main\Case Files\CUP\CU 10-08 Waste Management\Staff report to PC-CU 10-08.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.