6.6. SR 03-15-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I ~ Rev~ewcamments on the Revised ~! dro ea Re art Phase ~ and ~~} and Phase TZZPhase zv work P1an.t~ ' Fram: Matthew ~edv' Y ,9 p, Ana ~mlledv~na~nrg~nc,com~ sent: Thursday, August ~~, Z~O~ ~,~:~1 PM To: dave;lucasC~ca,sherburne.mn.us; ~ohn.elks~pca.state.mn.us; aeb waters ~~usiness rax) ; e~ demC~geamatr~ x. cam; ~ohnsan, Terry cc : , Ra 1 f , stave ; rhaugc~ci . e1 k~ ri ve r . mn ; u s subject: Fw: Review/comments on the Revised Hydrageo Report tPhase z and ~z7 and Phase ~~z/Phase ~v work P1 an Steve Roh1f has requested that ~ forward my review and comments an the abave~ refe ran cad tapi c . ~ Regards, Matt. Matt ~.edvi na, P. E, m11 edvi naC~n rgi nc . com 6~.~. ~~9. ~~~.~ ~i rect ~1,Z . ~ ~ 9.499 t=ax From: Matthew ~edvi~na sent: Wednesday, August q~, ~Qa~ 9:~3 AM To : r' Rohl f, Steve' ; Rebecca Waug ~rf~augC~ci . e1 k--ri var. rnn , use subject: Rev~ew~camments an the Rev7sed Hydrogen Report Phase ~: and sz~ and Phase ~zY/Phase ~v worst Plan stave: ~ have completed m review of the above referenced Report for the south pevela ment Area of the wMT, ~ k River I~andfi 11. My comments are presented below ~ver~1 ,the effort answered many important questions The,deep bor7ngs,show that there ~s mare complexity and quests ons regards ng the cants nun ty for the t~ 11 1 a er between the upper and 1ower,autwash unfits which transmit ~w at the site. r t ink the water 1 eve1 data prove des suffi c~ ant evidence to support the wMx hypothesis that they are not connected , atherwi se, we would require moni tors ng of the 1 aver vutwash . P1 ease 1 et me knew i f you wool d 1 i k~ me to convey my comments . , , . , emai 1 ar letter....and to which ~nvalved parties. comments; The constru~t~ an of the 1 over vutwash , pi ezometers at 1 acati ons 3~.5, ~~.7 and ~1~ provide adds t~ onal data an the i ntegr~ ty of the t~ 11 un~ t ~ n the west and sau~;h page ~.