My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-02-2001 CC MIN - SPECIAL
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
07-02-2001 CC MIN - SPECIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:34 AM
Creation date
5/8/2003 1:49:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
7/2/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 3 <br />July 2, 2001 <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN MOVED TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PROCEED <br />WITH THE HIRING OF A PROSECUTING CITY ATTORNEY AS A STAFF <br />MEMBER BEGINNING IN 2002 AND TO PROVIDE THE COUNTY WITH <br />SIX-MONTH NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF SERVICES. <br />COUNCILMEMBER TVEITE SECONDED TI-IE MOTION. THE MOTION <br />CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />2002 Budget Discussion <br /> <br />City Administrator Pat K. laers reviewed the 2002 budget items and issues listed in his June <br />20, 2001 memo. Presentation began w/th an overvie~v of the 2001 legislative session. Items <br />noted include levy limits, the possible need for equipment certificates, the elimination of <br />HACA, increases in LGA, and the impact of the new tax formula on TIF districts. <br />Furthermore, it was noted that no truth-h-taxation public hearings are required for the 2002 <br />budget. <br /> <br />An overview of the 2002 budget indicates that the revenues are projected to increase 9% or <br />$581,700. Revenues are projected in the amount of $7,051,700. Expenditures are projected <br />to increase almost 15% or by $964,000. Total expenditures requested amount to $7,434,000. <br />Comparing these two figures creates a budget gap between projected revenues and requested <br />expenditures of $382,300. <br /> <br />The revenues discussion centered on additional property taxes and additional growth related <br />revenues in such areas as building permits and plan check fees. It was noted that an <br />additional $450,000 in tax revenue is projected for the general fund and that the growth <br />related revenues are more closely related to 1999 levels than the extraordinarily high levels <br />that were received in 2000. The street services additional revenue is based on anticipated <br />money from the municipal utilities for mechanic services. It was also noted that the l/quor <br />and utilities transfers are both increasing by $10,000. <br /> <br />The expenditure categories were reviewed and most of the discussion related to personal <br />services, additional employees, and capital outlay (equipment/vehicle) expenditures. The <br />possible need to use equipment certificates was discussed. It was noted that interest rates are <br />currendy very Iow for equipment certificates. <br /> <br />Finance Director LoriJohnson reviewed the optical imaging system that is proposed as a <br />capital outlay purchase for 2002. The city administrator suggested this expenditure be <br />removed from the general fund budget and that it be placed into the equipment reserve <br />budget. Furthermore, revenues (by way of administrative project fees from the East Elk <br />River project) need to be put into the equipment reserve to fund this expenditure. <br /> <br />The Council discussed the f~re department floor repair project. It was suggested that this <br />$22,500 item also be moved into the equipment reserves budget and that revenue come into <br />this budget by way of the State reimbursement for city expenses associated with the July <br />1997 storm. <br /> <br />The $150,000 street/park department truck was discussed. The city administrator suggested <br />that half of this truck be £manced with tax revenue and the other half with equipment <br />reserves. The Council indicated that maybe all of the truck cost should be financed outside <br />of the general fund; either by way of equipment reserves or equipment certificates. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.