My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.11. SR 06-18-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
06/18/2001
>
6.11. SR 06-18-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:34 AM
Creation date
5/7/2003 8:58:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/18/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC <br /> <br />June 7, 2001 <br /> <br />City of Elk River <br />Attn: Michele McPherson <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />P.O. Box 490 <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br /> <br />RE: June Adm. Subdivision Comments <br /> <br /> Sherbu~ <br />WORKS DEPARTMENT <br /> <br /> Rhonda F. Lewis, P.E. <br /> 425 Jackson A venue <br /> Elk River, MN 55330 <br /> (763) 241-7030 · 800-594-5208 <br /> <br />Dear Ms. McPherson; <br /> <br />After reviewing drawings that have been received in our office during the past several weeks we <br />offer the following comments: <br /> <br />We support William Zacharda's request to split his land (County Highway 33) and create <br />parcels A and B. We required 17 feet of additional right of way be granted in fee title (for a total <br />of 50 feet). Parcel A and B must share access on the existing driveway; no change within the <br />right of way will be permitted. <br /> <br />We support Sharon Bauer's request to split her land (County Highway 31) and create parcels <br />A and B. We require 17' of additional right of way be granted in fee title (for a total of 50"). <br />Parcel A and B must share an access located on the common lot line and the existing access must <br />be removed. This requires a permit from our office. <br /> <br />Sherbume County does not oppose the proposed land split for Arne Engstrom, however we <br />recommend not encumbering Parcel A & B with a driveway easement. For the short term this <br />may seem like a good idea. Access to 209~h Avenue seems like the logical access point. We <br />would not allow access to County Highway 32. We will require 17' of additional right of way be <br />granted in fee title (for a total of 50'). If parcel C requires its' own access, a permit from our <br />office is required. <br /> <br />Richard D. Corbin <br />Sherburne County Public Works <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.